mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Test-time Adaptation of Pelvic Bone Segmentation Models via Dynamic Reliability-Guided

arXiv 2608.00510 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable pelvic bone segmentation (PBS) from CT is essential for robot-assisted pelvic trauma surgery, yet deploying a source-trained model to a new hospital suffers from severe performance degradation due to cross-center domain shifts. While test-time adaptation (TTA) enables online model adaptation without accessing source data, existing methods show limited effectiveness for PBS, facing challenges including boundary degradation, anatomical inconsistency under domain shifts, and voxel-level class imbalance. To address these challenges, we propose a novel closed-loop dynamic Reliability-Guided TTA framework (ReGA) for PBS. Specifically, we introduce a pseudo-label reliability criterion termed Segmentation Inference Consistency Evaluation (SICE), which jointly measures region overlap and boundary deviation via dropout-based ensemble predictions. Based on SICE, a trust-weighted refinement module adaptively updates features to mitigate boundary errors in pseudo-labels. Furthermore, a confidence-weighted region-level contrastive learning strategy is proposed to enforce anatomical consistency. Finally, ReGA follows the teacher-student (TS) scheme to alleviate voxel-level class imbalance. Experiments on three heterogeneous 3D pelvic CT datasets demonstrate that ReGA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art TTA methods, enabling effective adaptation of the source-trained PBS model to unseen clinical domains. The code is available at https://github.com/Ren-ling/ReGA.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  3. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  4. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 371
  5. 2019The KiTS19 Challenge Data: 300 Kidney Tumor Cases with Clinical Context, CT Semantic Segmentations, and Surgical Outcomescited by 168
  6. 2023Guiding Pseudo-labels with Uncertainty Estimation for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 63
  7. 2020Deep Learning to Segment Pelvic Bones: Large-scale CT Datasets and Baseline Modelscited by 45
  8. 2023Each Test Image Deserves A Specific Prompt: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for 2D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 29
  9. 2022DLTTA: Dynamic Learning Rate for Test-time Adaptation on Cross-domain Medical Imagescited by 28
  10. 2023MAPSeg: Unified Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Heterogeneous Medical Image Segmentation Based on 3D Masked Autoencoding and Pseudo-Labelingcited by 25
  11. 2023Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentation via Prototype-Anchored Feature Alignment and Contrastive Learningcited by 14
  12. 2024FPL+: Filtered Pseudo Label-based Unsupervised Cross-Modality Adaptation for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
2 more
  1. 2024Medical Image Segmentation with InTEnt: Integrated Entropy Weighting for Single Image Test-Time Adaptationcited by 9
  2. 2024AETTA: Label-Free Accuracy Estimation for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.