mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Upper Confidence Bounds for the Prediction Error of Kernel Ridge Regression via Gaussian Refitting

arXiv 2607.28846 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026stat.MEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Assessing a single model fit requires a computable upper confidence bound for the gap between the fit and the unknown truth, as mean estimates ignore realization variance. Standard cross-validation margins are bottlenecked at order n-1/2 by noise fluctuations, even when the true error shrinks faster. While wild refitting cancels this noise level, existing Rademacher sign methods degenerate for kernel ridge regression and rely on unobservable quantities. We propose a Gaussian refit for kernel ridge regression. By Anderson's inequality, the fit movement is monotone in the noise sizes, yielding a computable tail bound. Assuming only symmetric noise, the bound requires no moment assumptions and is calibrated at any confidence level via order statistics. Theoretically, using a worst-case envelope, the bound contracts at the minimax rate OP(n-2s/(2s+1)), correctly matching the prediction error. Empirically, using a practical data-driven envelope, the bound maintains full coverage within twice the true 95% error quantile. By contrast, cross-validation exceeds this quantile by factors up to 51, and by hundreds under infinite-variance noise. The procedure extends empirically to nonlinear constrained estimators and real spatial data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.