Preventing Premature Commitment in Coding Agents with an Evidence-Conditioned Execution Layer
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM-based coding agents often edit source code or submit patches before examining enough repository evidence to justify the change, a failure pattern we call premature commitment. We present ECLoop, an execution layer that interposes between the agent and the repository to enforce evidence-conditioned execution. For each task, ECLoop uses the issue description and repository structure to compile a set of conditions specifying what the agent should observe before each type of code modification or patch submission. During execution, ECLoop tracks which conditions the agent's runtime trajectory has satisfied and postpones any proposed action whose required conditions remain unmet. Evaluated on all 500 instances of SWE-bench Verified with two language models and two agent scaffolds, ECLoop raises Pass@1 by 4.8-11.8 percentage points without model retraining or scaffold changes. Ablation experiments show that each of ECLoop's three operations contributes distinct value and that structured evidence conditions outperform an equivalent natural-language summary. These gains come at no additional inference cost: by redirecting the agent before it pursues unsupported actions, ECLoop lowers average token consumption by up to 12.1%.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ReProAgent: Tool-Augmented Multi-Stage Agentic Generation of Bug Reproduction Tests from Issue Reports10 Jul
- 2026SWE-Doctor: Guiding Software Engineering Agents with Runtime Diagnosis from Multi-Faceted Bug Reproduction Tests1 Jul
- 2026Coding Agents Don't Know When to Act8 May
- 2026SWE-TRACE: Optimizing Long-Horizon SWE Agents Through Rubric Process Reward Models and Heuristic Test-Time Scaling16 Apr
- 2026Accurate Failure Prediction in Agents Does Not Imply Effective Failure Prevention3 Feb
- 2025REFINE: Enhancing Program Repair Agents through Context-Aware Patch Refinement4 Oct
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
Other references · 10
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 223
- 2024GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoningcited by 124
- 2025AGrail: A Lifelong Agent Guardrail with Effective and Adaptive Safety Detectioncited by 89
- 2025VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generationcited by 49
- 2025Enforcing Temporal Constraints for LLM Agentscited by 34
- 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AIcited by 19
- 2026LLM Agents Already Know When to Call Tools -- Even Without Reasoningcited by 19
- 2025Agent-SAMA: State-Aware Mobile Assistantcited by 12
- 2026From Risk Classification to Action Plan Remediation: A Guardrail Feedback Driven Framework for LLM Agentscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026ExecCritic: Learn to Test, Test to Improve for Coding Agentscited by 3
- 2026Why Didn't It Check? Unsupported Final Claims and Their Repair in Two Tool-Equipped Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026ExecCritic: Learn to Test, Test to Improve for Coding Agents8 Sep 2026
- 2026Why Didn't It Check? Unsupported Final Claims and Their Repair in Two Tool-Equipped Language Models27 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Coupling Planning with Episodic Memory in LLM Agents for Software Issue Resolution
- 2026Turning Interaction History into Execution State: A Runtime Layer for Long-Horizon Coding Agents
- 2026ProcCtrlBench: Evaluating Process-Level Defects and Control Preservation in LLM Coding Agents
- 2026Teaching Agents to Code Reliably
- 2026StateHarness: Maintaining Evolving Project State for Long-Horizon Coding Agents
- 2026Assurance Envelopes for Autonomous Coding Agents: Minimum-Cost Evidence for Software Change
- 2026Evidence-Calibrated Runtime Reconstruction for Agent Skills Across Heterogeneous Coding Agents
- 2026EvoCode-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents in Multi-Turn Iterative Interactions