Stratified Negation in RDF Rules: A Correct Approach (Extended Version)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Combining RDF rule languages, such as N3 or SHACL Rules, with default negation is challenging. Existing methods to stratify negation often fail for RDF rules, since individual triples do not carry enough information to meaningfully restrict potential dependencies. Blank nodes in rule heads further complicate the matter, since the order of rule applications may determine whether new values are created, which in turn can change the applicability of rules with negation. To solve these open problems, we propose chain stratification as a robust new condition that guarantees a well-behaved semantics for RDF rules with negation, and existential rules in general. Our condition combines an elaborate analysis of potential multistep derivations with a mechanism for using integrity constraints to discard impossible cases. Applying rules in any order that respects chain stratification is guaranteed to derive an RDF graph that is unique, lean, and justified under the usual negation-as-failure semantics. To show the practicality, we also provide a prototype implementation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
6 of 26 references.
References · 6
- 2018The Vadalog System: Datalog-based Reasoning for Knowledge Graphscited by 25
- 2014Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules and Their Application to Query Answering in Ontologiescited by 10
- 2015Column-Oriented Datalog Materialization for Large Knowledge Graphs (Extended Technical Report)cited by 8
- 2021Answering Queries with Negation over Existential Rulescited by 4
- 2022Efficient Dependency Analysis for Rule-Based Ontologiescited by 2
- 2023Existential Notation3 Logiccited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.