Efficient Dependency Analysis for Rule-Based Ontologies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Several types of dependencies have been proposed for the static analysis of existential rule ontologies, promising insights about computational properties and possible practical uses of a given set of rules, e.g., in ontology-based query answering. Unfortunately, these dependencies are rarely implemented, so their potential is hardly realised in practice. We focus on two kinds of rule dependencies -- positive reliances and restraints -- and design and implement optimised algorithms for their efficient computation. Experiments on real-world ontologies of up to more than 100,000 rules show the scalability of our approach, which lets us realise several previously proposed applications as practical case studies. In particular, we can analyse to what extent rule-based bottom-up approaches of reasoning can be guaranteed to yield redundancy-free "lean" knowledge graphs (so-called cores) on practical ontologies.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2022.
Builds on
6 of 27 references.
References · 6
- 2018The Vadalog System: Datalog-based Reasoning for Knowledge Graphscited by 25
- 2014Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules and Their Application to Query Answering in Ontologiescited by 10
- 2015Column-Oriented Datalog Materialization for Large Knowledge Graphs (Extended Technical Report)cited by 8
- 2013Anatomy of the chasecited by 5
- 2021Answering Queries with Negation over Existential Rulescited by 4
- 2021Capturing Homomorphism-Closed Decidable Queries with Existential Rulescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.