mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

APO: Unsupervised Atomic Policy Optimization for 3D Structure Prediction of Atomic Systems

arXiv 2607.28553 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predicting the 3D structures of atomic systems is fundamental to advancing material science and drug discovery. While flow-matching models (, FlowDPO) have recently shown promise in this domain, their performance relies heavily on alignment with ground-truth coordinates via supervised preference learning. However, obtaining experimental labels for novel crystal phases or de novo proteins is prohibitively expensive, creating a bottleneck for structural modeling in data-scarce regimes. In this work, we propose (Atomic Policy Optimization), a fully unsupervised alignment framework that eliminates the need for ground-truth reference structures. APO adapts group-relative policy optimization to 3D atomic environments, utilizing a novel dual-reward mechanism: (i) a that reinforces the policy's dominant latent structural modes through eigen-decomposition of sample similarities, and (ii) a that enforces thermodynamic stability. Our framework enables the model to ``self-correct'' by identifying physically plausible configurations within sampled groups. Extensive benchmarks on crystal and antibody structure prediction demonstrate that APO consistently outperforms fully supervised baselines, achieving a new state-of-the-art in match rates and structural fidelity. Furthermore, we show that APO effectively straightens probability paths, significantly improving inference efficiency. Our results suggest that intrinsic physical consistency can serve as a superior guide for alignment compared to noisy, supervised coordinate matching.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 19 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  5. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 964
  6. 2021Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generationcited by 268
  7. 2022Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generationcited by 262
  8. 2022Protein structure generation via folding diffusioncited by 113

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EP-Flow: Disordered Crystal Structure Prediction without Site-Level Annotations
  2. 2026Let CSP Be Your ANCHOR: Adaptive Crystal Search over Frozen Structure Priors
  3. 2025OXtal: An All-Atom Diffusion Model for Organic Crystal Structure Prediction
  4. 2026GLASS: Global Latent Aggregation with Slot-based Set Decoding for Scalable All-Atom Crystal Generation
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning on the Discrete Composition Channel of a Crystal Generator: Validated Gains and Reward Hacking
  6. 2026SinAE: A Single-Architecture Flow-Matching Autoencoder for Cross-Domain Atomic Systems
  7. 2026CrystalBoltz: End-to-End Protein Structure Determination via Experiment-Guided Diffusion for X-Ray Crystallography
  8. 2026CrystalReasoner: Reasoning and RL for Property-Conditioned Crystal Structure Generation