mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fully Inductive Cardinality Estimation

arXiv 2607.28311 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.DB cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Query optimization of Basic Graph Patterns (BGP) SPARQL queries over Knowledge Graphs (KG) requires accurate cardinality estimation. Recently published learned estimators outperform statistics- and sampling-based approaches, but share a limitation preventing their adoption in real-world triplestores: they are transductive and require retraining when the underlying graph changes or when applied to new graphs. We present FICE (Fully Inductive Cardinality Estimation), the first learned cardinality estimator for BGP queries over KGs that generalizes to entirely unseen graphs (including unseen relations), without any retraining. FICE is a graph neural network (GNN) with two coupled components. First, an encoder GNN over a factor-graph view of the KG produces entity and relation embeddings. We prove that BGP cardinality is a local function of the 2-hop neighborhood around bound terms in this view, motivating the local message-passing encoder. A decoder GNN then composes these embeddings along the join topology of the query to predict log-cardinality. The encoder and decoder are trained jointly, making the embeddings specialized for cardinality estimation. FICE is trained using neighborhood sampling to scale to KGs with millions of triples, and decouples embedding generation from cardinality decoding to enable estimation latency below a millisecond. Compared to learned and non-learned baselines over 10 KGs, FICE reduces the overall median q-error from 13.54 (for the best competitor) to 5.34 and dominates all approaches in tail behavior.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 47 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  3. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  4. 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 971
  5. 2019Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objectscited by 205
  6. 2023Towards Foundation Models for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 86
  7. 2019Neo: A Learned Query Optimizercited by 80
  8. 2018Learned Cardinalities: Estimating Correlated Joins with Deep Learningcited by 64
  9. 2020Bao: Learning to Steer Query Optimizerscited by 62
  10. 2025PyG 2.0: Scalable Learning on Real World Graphscited by 52
  11. 2021Cardinality Estimation in DBMS: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluationcited by 30
  12. 2023Lero: A Learning-to-Rank Query Optimizercited by 26
6 more
  1. 2021Flow-Loss: Learning Cardinality Estimates That Mattercited by 22
  2. 2024PRICE: A Pretrained Model for Cross-Database Cardinality Estimationcited by 8
  3. 2018Estimating the Cardinality of Conjunctive Queries over RDF Data Using Graph Summarisationcited by 4
  4. 2021LMKG: Learned Models for Cardinality Estimation in Knowledge Graphscited by 4
  5. 2023Cardinality Estimation over Knowledge Graphs with Embeddings and Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
  6. 2024Neuro-Symbolic Query Optimization in Knowledge Graphscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.