mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Rephrasing: Book-Level Organization Improves Synthetic Textbook Data for Mid-Training

arXiv 2607.28109 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic textbook data has improved language model pre-training, but prior work largely treats the benefit as a property of generated content or local rewriting style. We study a different factor: whether related content is organized into coherent book-level documents. We contribute both a scalable synthesis pipeline and controlled evidence that this organization matters. The pipeline retrieves source material from a pre-training corpus, clusters it into topical units, plans hierarchical tables of contents, and assembles source-grounded sections into complete books (our Full setting), yielding 686K textbooks (32B tokens) across 15,000+ disciplines. Replacing natural books in a mid-training mix with this corpus improves downstream performance by +1.09 on average. Controlled comparisons then disentangle the relevant design factors. A content-matched Split condition holds generated text and tokens fixed but treats each section as an independent document; Full's +1.02 mean gain isolates document packaging. A length-matched RandomConcat control that joins sections from different books remains below Full, ruling out document length alone. A retrieval-pool-matched Rephrase condition independently rewrites individual retrieved documents under the same audience-by-style scheme, without clustering, TOC planning, or book assembly; Full's +1.17 gain demonstrates the value of structured synthesis. On Llama3-8B, Full likewise outperforms both RandomConcat and Natural Books, supporting book-level organization as a useful axis for synthetic pre-training data design.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

49 of 67 references.

References · 49

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  8. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  9. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
  10. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  11. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  12. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
37 more
  1. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  2. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  3. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  4. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
  5. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  6. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
  7. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  8. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  9. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
  10. 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 569
  11. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
  12. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
  13. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  14. 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 530
  15. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  16. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
  17. 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
  18. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
  19. 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 373
  20. 2023The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variantscited by 311
  21. 2024RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAGcited by 262
  22. 2024Are We Done with MMLU?cited by 194
  23. 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 161
  24. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
  25. 2023CMATH: Can Your Language Model Pass Chinese Elementary School Math Test?cited by 90
  26. 2024INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledgecited by 86
  27. 2023In-context Pretraining: Language Modeling Beyond Document Boundariescited by 79
  28. 2024KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Taskscited by 70
  29. 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 48
  30. 2024Fewer Truncations Improve Language Modelingcited by 35
  31. 2024Source2Synth: Synthetic Data Generation and Curation Grounded in Real Data Sourcescited by 28
  32. 2024Autonomous Data Selection with Zero-shot Generative Classifiers for Mathematical Textscited by 27
  33. 2024Analysing The Impact of Sequence Composition on Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 25
  34. 2025Mid-Training of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 21
  35. 2023Structured Packing in LLM Training Improves Long Context Utilizationcited by 17
  36. 2025LiteLong: Resource-Efficient Long-Context Data Synthesis for LLMscited by 3
  37. 2025From Amateur to Master: Infusing Knowledge into LLMs via Automated Curriculum Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and Pitfalls
  2. 2026How Can We Synthesize High-Quality Pretraining Data? A Systematic Study of Prompt Design, Generator Model, and Source Data
  3. 2026A Factorial Study of Synthetic Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translation using Grammar Books
  4. 2025Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models
  5. 2025Grounding Synthetic Data Evaluations of Language Models in Unsupervised Document Corpora
  6. 2023Did the Neurons Read your Book? Document-level Membership Inference for Large Language Models
  7. 2026Synthetic Mixed Training: Scaling Parametric Knowledge Acquisition Beyond RAG
  8. 2024Better Alignment with Instruction Back-and-Forth Translation