mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Baikal: Structured Search for Deep Research over Data Lakes

arXiv 2607.27726 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep research over data lakes requires an LLM agent to investigate evidence across thousands of heterogeneous tables and passages to synthesize a report. Existing methods perform iterative retrieval and generation, letting accumulated context determine what to investigate next, which can overexploit locally promising evidence and fail to cover distinct semantic regions under a fixed budget. To address this, we cast deep research over data lakes as a budgeted search problem and present Baikal - a framework that clusters heterogeneous evidence into semantic regions, then searches over them adaptively to balance exploration and exploitation. Within each selected region, Baikal generates and investigates region-grounded subquestions, using finding quality as rewards to update region-level value estimates and guide search under policies ranging from random and LLM-guided selection to Bayesian ε-greedy and UCB. We evaluate Baikal on 15 queries each over HybridQA and TAT-QA data lakes containing 10,993 and 2,757 tables, respectively, together with 227K Wikipedia passages and 13K financial report passages. We assess research quality with a new rubric covering groundedness, relevance, diversity, and utility, and use GPT-5-mini to score Baikal and strong baselines, including DeepSearcher and an OpenCode research agent with retrieval and clustering variants. Across both data lakes, Baikal performs strongly under several region-selection policies; its best configuration improves report scores over the strongest baselines by 28% on HybridQA and 36% on TAT-QA. Our analyses attribute these gains to organizing and exploring semantic evidence regions, which improves groundedness and diversity and yields more useful findings under the same subquestion budget. These results demonstrate the value of structured semantic exploration for systematic research and discovery over heterogeneous data lakes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

17 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science19 Aug

Other references · 16

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  3. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  4. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  5. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
  6. 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 335
  7. 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 264
  8. 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 226
  9. 2026Learning to Discover at Test Timecited by 115
  10. 2024Can large language models explore in-context?cited by 76
  11. 2025CodeScientist: End-to-End Semi-Automated Scientific Discovery with Code-based Experimentationcited by 57
  12. 2024Data-driven Discovery with Large Generative Modelscited by 34
4 more
  1. 2025AutoDiscovery: Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian Surprisecited by 33
  2. 2023Bring Your Own KG: Self-Supervised Program Synthesis for Zero-Shot KGQAcited by 11
  3. 2025MiGrATe: Mixed-Policy GRPO for Adaptation at Test-Timecited by 7
  4. 2025DPDisc: From Factoid Questions to Data Product Requests for Open-World Data Product Discovery over Tables and Textcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research
  2. 2025DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
  3. 2026Hypothesis-Driven Deep Research with Large Language Models: A Structured Methodology for Automated Knowledge Discovery
  4. 2025Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition
  5. 2026Mr.LHDR: A Benchmark for Multimodal Real-World Long-Horizon Deep Research Agents
  6. 2026Personalized Deep Research: A User-Centric Framework, Dataset, and Hybrid Evaluation for Knowledge Discovery
  7. 2024ResearchArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models' Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents
  8. 2026Deep Research Pretraining via Predictive Navigation