mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Real-Time Hard Peak Age-of-Information Safety with No-Regret Learning

arXiv 2607.27626 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety-critical IoT systems such as industrial closed-loop control, V2X coordination, and remote teleoperation require every sensor's peak Age of Information (peak AoI, also abbreviated PAoI) to stay below a hard per-slot deadline, not merely an average bound. Existing approaches meet this requirement only under restrictive assumptions: stochastic channels for Whittle-index AoI, simulator rollouts for deep reinforcement learning, or sublinear cumulative violation for long-term constrained online convex optimization. Under adversarial coefficients, OCO-PAoI-Hard guarantees zero per-slot violation of the modeled AoI state under one-step viability and O(sqrt(T)) regret against any static safe comparator; packet-level safety requires stronger service assumptions. Our key observation is that the fractional peak-AoI deadline collapses exactly to an affine half-space constraint on the resource-allocation vector, turning hard real-time scheduling into time-varying constrained online convex optimization over a polyhedral safe set. A strictly causal proposal-shield-update loop enforces feasibility through one Euclidean projection per slot, the gradient step preserves no-regret behavior, and the classical virtual queue is reduced to an a-posteriori certificate. We establish closed-form static and dynamic regret bounds, a matching Omega(sqrt(T)) minimax lower bound, a margin-safe variant against execution noise, and a deadline-induced competitive ratio. On a four-sensor adversarial fluid-model trap channel, OCO-PAoI-Hard attains zero modeled-state deadline violations across all ten seeds, while four representative baselines miss between 1.65 percent and 64.0 percent of slots, and the empirical normalized regret stays below the theoretical envelope across two orders of magnitude in T.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 931
  2. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 798
  3. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 431
  4. 2019Constrained Reinforcement Learning Has Zero Duality Gapcited by 144
  5. 2017Online Convex Optimization with Stochastic Constraintscited by 94
  6. 2020Age of Information: An Introduction and Surveycited by 66
  7. 2015Adaptive Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Long-term Constraintscited by 65
  8. 2017An Online Convex Optimization Approach to Dynamic Network Resource Allocationcited by 42
  9. 2021Regret and Cumulative Constraint Violation Analysis for Online Convex Optimization with Long Term Constraintscited by 39
  10. 2018Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Wireless Communication: Tail, Risk and Scalecited by 22
  11. 2018Scheduling Policies for Minimizing Age of Information in Broadcast Wireless Networkscited by 22
  12. 2018Age of Information: Whittle Index for Scheduling Stochastic Arrivalscited by 20
5 more
  1. 2019A Whittle Index Approach to Minimizing Functions of Age of Informationcited by 20
  2. 2019Online Convex Optimization with Perturbed Constraintscited by 12
  3. 2018On the Role of Age of Information in the Internet of Thingscited by 11
  4. 2021A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Age of Information in Multi-User Networks with HARQcited by 8
  5. 2026Noise-Adaptive High-Probability Regret Bounds for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.