mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Backlog Items to Security Guidance: Towards Continuous Security Compliance

arXiv 2607.27374 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.SE cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous software engineering in regulated domains requires engineering teams to address security throughout the development lifecycle. Yet making security requirements explicit in backlog items is still problematic. Engineers must instead infer security relevance of backlog items from brief, free-form descriptions and often lack timely guidance on applicable requirements. We present an NLP-based backlog enrichment system that detects security-relevant backlog items and links them to relevant security requirements. The approach combines a security-relevance classifier with a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline over security requirements documents. The approach was developed and evaluated in the context of a large enterprise in highly regulated domains. We present three contributions. First, we release a dataset of 288 backlog items labeled for security relevance by nine security practitioners, with substantial agreement (Fleiss' kappa=0.787). Second, a recall-oriented classifier achieving F2=0.774 in-distribution and mean zero-shot G-measure ≈ 0.65 across five established benchmarks, matching or outperforming most published classical-ML and open-source GPT baselines. Third, we preliminarily evaluated a four-stage security requirements document-grounded RAG pipeline with two practitioners on industrial backlogs using company-internal security policies and CIS Benchmarks. Of the retrieved 24 clauses, 12 were rated at least 4/5 for relevance. Our findings provide first indicators that NLP-based product backlog enrichment can support engineers in identifying security requirements early in the development process. With this work we aim to facilitate continuous security compliance through proactive introduction of security requirements in continuous software engineering.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

7 of 39 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
  4. 2018The Impact of Class Rebalancing Techniques on the Performance and Interpretation of Defect Prediction Modelscited by 29
  5. 2025Reflections on the Reproducibility of Commercial LLM Performance in Empirical Software Engineering Studiescited by 12
  6. 2024Industrial Challenges in Secure Continuous Developmentcited by 1
  7. 2026Evaluating Large Language Models for Security Bug Report Predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ReVul-CoT: Towards Effective Software Vulnerability Assessment with Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Chain-of-Thought Prompting
  2. 2026BT-APE: A Computationally Light Backtracking Approach to Automatic Prompt Engineering for Requirements Classification ↗
  3. 2025Multi-Stage Retrieval for Operational Technology Cybersecurity Compliance Using Large Language Models: A Railway Casestudy
  4. 2025SecureReviewer: Enhancing Large Language Models for Secure Code Review through Secure-aware Fine-tuning
  5. 2026Inference-Time Safety For Code LLMs Via Retrieval-Augmented Revision
  6. 2025Leveraging Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment -- A Case from Forestry Cyber-Physical Systems
  7. 2026CTRAG: An In-Context Retrieval-based Framework for Automated Compliance Checking using LLMs
  8. 2025VulInstruct: Teaching LLMs Root-Cause Reasoning for Vulnerability Detection via Security Specifications