mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAUSE: A User-Centric Benchmark for Personal AI Assistants in Unified Service Environments

arXiv 2607.27354 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Personal AI assistants are increasingly deployed as task-oriented, tool-augmented agents that operate within unified service environments to support everyday user activities. In realistic settings, such assistants must reason over persistent user state, respect user-specific configurations and permissions, and sustain long-horizon, constraint-aware interactions across multiple services. Existing benchmarks, however, often fragment service contexts or abstract away user state, limiting their ability to evaluate user-centric personal assistant behavior in realistic service settings. We introduce PAUSE, a user-centric benchmark for evaluating personal AI assistants in stateful, service-integrated environments. PAUSE captures core challenges of real-world assistant deployment by requiring agents to coordinate actions across heterogeneous user-owned resources while maintaining consistency with environment state, authorization constraints over multi-turn interactions. The benchmark incorporates explicit user-agent interaction via realistic user simulation, enabling evaluation beyond static tool execution. To support principled and reproducible evaluation, PAUSE adopts a multi-regime evaluation framework aligned with task characteristics. Open-ended service management tasks are assessed using semantic and trajectory-level behavioral metrics, while constraint-intensive tasks admit deterministic, state-based verification. Benchmark results show that even state-of-the-art proprietary models fail to reach 70% task completion on scenarios requiring stateful reasoning and configuration awareness, revealing consistent and interpretable failure patterns. Finally, we present a user-centric synthesis pipeline that enables scalable generation of coherent service environments, user configurations, and reliably annotated tasks, supporting benchmark extensibility and future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 37 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
  2. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
  3. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  4. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 591
  5. 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 393
  6. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 295
  7. 2025APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplaycited by 167
  8. 2025The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Executioncited by 85
  9. 2025LiveMCPBench: Can Agents Navigate an Ocean of MCP Tools?cited by 48
  10. 2025Magnet: Multi-turn Tool-use Data Synthesis and Distillation via Graph Translationcited by 37
  11. 2024ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agentscited by 36
  12. 2025T1: A Tool-Oriented Conversational Dataset for Multi-Turn Agentic Planningcited by 14
2 more
  1. 2025ToolACE-MT: Non-Autoregressive Generation for Agentic Multi-Turn Interactioncited by 11
  2. 2025Benchmarking Failures in Tool-Augmented Language Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.