mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

HoF-Bench: Rediscovering Real AI-Discovered CVEs Without Frontier Models

arXiv 2607.27030 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based analyzers have begun finding real vulnerabilities in mature open-source projects: AISLE's analyzer is credited with more than 280 CVEs across 78 projects, including OpenSSL, curl, and GnuTLS. We introduce HoF-Bench (named after AISLE's public Hall of Fame), a benchmark built from 95 of these public AI-discovered CVEs across eight repositories pinned at vulnerable commits. Analyzers receive source and target-file scope but not CVE identifiers, descriptions, fixes, or expected mechanisms; a detector-blinded frontier-model judge credits only findings that identify the same code path, root cause, attack condition, and impact. A deliberately minimal LLM-based analyzer rediscovers up to 65 of the 95 CVEs (68%) under this strict protocol. No frontier model performs detection anywhere in the study. The ten detector backbones are five open-weight models (21B--284B total parameters, 3--13B active) and five proprietary small or "flash"-tier models. All of them run in the fixed scaffold with four repeated passes, an optional generated-context stage, and a replayable multi-round triage stage (7,600 model--CVE pass records). Difficulty is strongly structured by language; the CVEs missed by every model concentrate in C infrastructure code. HoF-Bench provides a compact test bed for comparing vulnerability scanners, their reliability across repeated runs, and the candidate volume they create. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/aisleinc/HoF-Bench.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 22 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Devign: Effective Vulnerability Identification by Learning Comprehensive Program Semantics via Graph Neural Networkscited by 272
  2. 2024Vulnerability Detection with Code Language Models: How Far Are We?cited by 136
  3. 2015Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICcited by 110
  4. 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Taskscited by 73
  5. 2025BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systemscited by 39
  6. 2025Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositoriescited by 30
  7. 2026RealVuln: Benchmarking Rule-Based, General-Purpose LLM, and Security-Specialized Scanners on Real-World Codecited by 4
  8. 2026DREA: Decoupled Reasoning and Exploration Agents for Repository-Level Vulnerability Detectioncited by 3
  9. 2026Snyk VulnBench JS 1.0: Can LLMs Find the Same Bugs Twice?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.