mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RealVuln: Benchmarking Rule-Based, General-Purpose LLM, and Security-Specialized Scanners on Real-World Code

arXiv 2604.13764 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2026cs.CRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How do security scanners perform on real-world code? We present RealVuln, the first open-source benchmark comparing Rule-Based SAST, General-Purpose LLMs, and Security-Specialized scanners on 26 intentionally vulnerable Python repositories (educational and Capture-The-Flag applications) with 796 hand-labeled entries (676 vulnerabilities, 120 false-positive traps). We test 15 scanners (3 Rule-Based SAST, 10 General-Purpose LLM, 2 Security-Specialized) and rank them by F3 score (beta=3, weighting recall 9x over precision). A clear three-tier ranking emerges under all metrics. Under F3, the Security-Specialized scanner Kolega.Dev (73.0) leads, followed by the best General-Purpose LLM, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (51.7), which in turn scores nearly 3x higher than the best Rule-Based tool, Semgrep (17.7). Under F1, Sonnet 4.6 leads (60.9) with Kolega.Dev at 52.4. Rankings within tiers shift with beta, but the three-tier hierarchy holds across all weightings. All code, ground-truth data, scanner outputs, and scoring scripts are released under an open-source license. An interactive dashboard is at https://realvuln.kolega.dev/. RealVuln is a living benchmark: versioned, community-driven, with a roadmap toward multi-language coverage.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.