mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TreeCCA: Canonical Correlation Analysis via Gradient-Boosted Trees

arXiv 2607.27027 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient-boosted trees dominate tabular machine learning, yet canonical correlation analysis has always relied on linear or neural encoders. We propose TreeCCA, the first method to train gradient-boosted tree ensembles end-to-end as CCA encoders, inheriting their plug-and-play reliability: no architecture design, familiar hyperparameters, and strong performance with defaults. The technical enabler is the Eckart-Young (EY) loss, which supplies closed-form per-sample gradients that slot directly into any standard GBT library (XGBoost, LightGBM) as a custom objective. TreeCCA is the first CCA method to combine nonlinear accuracy with native interpretability: every tree split selects one feature, so gain importances reveal which inputs drive cross-view correlation at no extra cost. We demonstrate these properties on synthetic benchmarks, where TreeCCA matches or exceeds Deep CCA (2.61 vs. 2.43 on Signed Power; 2.93 vs. 2.89 on Hermite), and on a sparse benchmark with zero linear cross-view covariance, where TreeCCA recovers the true support with Precision@S = 1.00 at p=50 while PMD finds no signal. On the UCI HAR sensor-fusion benchmark, TreeCCA achieves comparable accuracy to Deep CCA at 5× lower cost, while XGBoost gain importances directly validate a physics-motivated hypothesis about the data --- an interpretation not readily available with neural encoders. Across five popular tabular multi-view datasets, TreeMCCA consistently matches or exceeds linear CCA in both nonlinear correlation extraction and downstream classification accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  3. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  4. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  5. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
  6. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
  7. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
  8. 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 156
  9. 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 104
  10. 2016Deep Variational Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 44
  11. 2017A Tutorial on Canonical Correlation Methodscited by 14
  12. 2015Canonical Correlation Forestscited by 12
2 more
  1. 2023Unconstrained Stochastic CCA: Unifying Multiview and Self-Supervised Learningcited by 7
  2. 2024Preventing Model Collapse in Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis by Noise Regularizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.