mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Persona-based Rate Action Index

arXiv 2607.26545 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose an index for predicting the U.S. Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decision to hike/hold/cut the current federal funds target rate based on how a collection of personas responds to current market conditions. To construct the index, we collected a new dataset consisting of nearly 25,000 retrievable chunks from publicly available data. We partition the data into per-member corpora and use each as the retrieval database of a generative system we refer to throughout as a ``persona''. We first evaluate the personas across two complementary components of likeness: identifiability and detectability. Each persona's behavior is highly attributable (average member-conditional recall is 8× chance) and generated content is nearly indistinguishable from held-out real content (hatτdet = 0.23 against a 0.15 floor). We then present evidence that query-conditioned representations of the personas capture members' monetary-policy stance relative to a known hawk--dove reputational ordering (Kendall's τ = 0.63, p < 0.001), substantially outperforming retrieval-only representations. These representations vary with time and current market conditions and form the basis of our proposed persona-based rate action index. For the 2022--2025 period the index tracks the rate cycle (Kendall's τ = 0.68, p < 10-6) and can be used to construct a simple classifier that predicts per-meeting outcomes at non-trivial accuracy (0.69 versus a 0.47 base rate). Importantly, the index outperforms informative baselines and leads the federal funds target rate by roughly three quarters. As far as we are aware, our results are the first to demonstrate the ability to capture time-varying group behavior via a collection of digital personas.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 42 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  2. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  3. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
  4. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
  5. 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 206
  6. 2023Trillion Dollar Words: A New Financial Dataset, Task & Market Analysiscited by 73
  7. 2025How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulationcited by 21
  8. 2024Investigating social alignment via mirroring in a system of interacting language modelscited by 5
  9. 2026LLM Powered Social Digital Twins: A Framework for Simulating Population Behavioral Response to Policy Interventionscited by 3
  10. 2026When prompt perturbations break your A/B test: A valid statistical test for generative surveyingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.