ScoreShield: Differentially Private Release of Similarity Scores
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A growing number of applications, such as biometrics and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), rely on cosine similarity scores computed between vector embeddings of text, images, or audio. These systems return similarity scores through their APIs for ranking and verification. However, such releases can leak information about individual records and enable membership inference attacks. While differential privacy (DP) provides a principled metric for quantifying attack risks, na"ive application of DP mechanisms---such as adding i.i.d. Gaussian noise to vector entries---leads to excessive distortion (i.e., low utility) at a given privacy constraint that scales poorly with the number of released scores. We propose textscScoreShield, a perturb-then-project mechanism that adds Gaussian noise calibrated to global sensitivity of the chosen score release regime and then projects the result onto the feasibility set of valid cosine objects. textscScoreShield satisfies (varepsilon,δ)-DP for releasing similarity score vectors and Gram matrices. We provide utility guarantees for the exact Frobenius metric projection used in the risk analysis, and prove convergence to feasibility for the practical averaged alternating-projection solver used for large-scale Gram releases. For full pairwise cosine Gram release under record-level replacement adjacency, the exact-projection bound improves the n-dependence of squared Frobenius risk from Theta(n3) for the na"ive Gaussian baseline to O(n2) for fixed privacy parameters, with sharper local bounds at low-rank Grams. We evaluate the mechanism across RAG, face recognition, semantic retrieval, image similarity, and recommender-system tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
9 of 86 references.
References · 9
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2026Qwen3-VL-Embedding and Qwen3-VL-Reranker: A Unified Framework for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Retrieval and Rankingcited by 230
- 2025EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representationscited by 139
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Differential Privacycited by 39
- 2025Safeguarding Privacy of Retrieval Data against Membership Inference Attacks: Is This Query Too Close to Home?cited by 9
- 2025Differentially Private Synthetic Text Generation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)cited by 6
- 2025Private-RAG: Answering Multiple Queries with LLMs while Keeping Your Data Privatecited by 3
- 2025BudgetLeak: Membership Inference Attacks on RAG Systems via the Generation Budget Side Channelcited by 3
- 2025On Opial's Lemmacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Empirical Calibration and Metric Differential Privacy in Language Models
- 2025The DCR Delusion: Measuring the Privacy Risk of Synthetic Data
- 2024Noise Variance Optimization in Differential Privacy: A Game-Theoretic Approach Through Per-Instance Differential Privacy ↗
- 2026Assessing Per-Sample Membership Inference Vulnerability without Retraining
- 2024Calibrating Practical Privacy Risks for Differentially Private Machine Learning
- 2023Epsilon*: Privacy Metric for Machine Learning Models
- 2026Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing (Extended Version)
- 2022One Parameter Defense -- Defending against Data Inference Attacks via Differential Privacy