mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Game AI Not Fun? A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis on the Differences in Enjoyment between Human and Computer Opponents

arXiv 2607.24749 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although advancements in game character AI aim to enhance player engagement, evidence suggests that perceiving an opponent as artificial can diminish the psychological experience. This paper presents a scoping review and meta-analysis of empirical studies focusing on player enjoyment when competing against human versus computer opponents. First, the scoping review was conducted to map the landscape of 20 included studies, detailing their study designs, outcome measures, and research foci. Second, a three-level meta-analysis synthesizing baseline comparisons from nine studies quantitatively assesses the differences in enjoyment. The results demonstrate a statistically significant, medium-to-large pooled effect size, indicating a psychological penalty in computer-opponent conditions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the extant knowledge on this topic, and underscores the necessity for further research in order to fully understand and resolve the penalty of the computer opponent context.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 37 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024GPT for Games: An Updated Scoping Review (2020-2024)cited by 10
  2. 2025Psychological and behavioural responses in human-agent vs. human-human interactions: a systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.