Simulating Tenant Responses to Energy Policy Interventions with Transaction-Cost-Aware LLM Agent
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies use Large language models (LLMs) to simulate human opinions and decisions by prompting models with demographic, attitudinal, or persona-based descriptions. Yet such simulations rarely model the practical, cognitive, or social frictions that shape how people respond to policy interventions. Perceived transaction cost (PTC) provides a useful lens for modeling the practical frictions that shape policy responses, such as information burden, administrative effort, coordination demands, and perceived uncertainty. We use this lens to develop a friction-aware persona modeling approach for LLM-based simulation. In the context of energy-efficient renovation (EER), tenants are represented not only by who they are demographically, but by how they perceive the costs, benefits, barriers, and uncertainties associated with proposed renovation plans. Using survey data collected from 1,068 citizens in the Netherlands, comprising approximately 40,548 survey question and answer pairs, we compare prompt-only and fine-tuned settings across GPT-3.5-turbo, Ministral-8B-Instruct, and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, and evaluate supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) for local open-weight models. Results show that incorporating PTC-based personas and reasoning consistently improves model performance across both prompt-only and fine-tuned settings, suggesting that PTC-based persona design provides a useful bridge between institutional policy theory and interpretable LLM-based policy simulation. Code is available at https://github.com/xiaweijie1996/socialagent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 26 references.
References · 8
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
- 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 515
- 2022Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systemscited by 301
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Can Large Language Models Simulate Human Responses? A Case Study of Stated Preference Experiments in the Context of Heating-related Choices
- 2026From Survey Personas to LLM Agents: A Generative Agent-based Simulation of Mobility Policy Preference Dynamics
- 2026CoRenew: A large language model agent-based policy simulation platform for multifamily residential redevelopment
- 2026LLM-Assisted Behavioural and Scenario Augmentation for Agent-Based Energy Adoption Models
- 2025Negotiating Comfort: Simulating Personality-Driven LLM Agents in Shared Residential Social Networks
- 2026OccuReward: LLM-Guided Occupant-Centric Reward Shaping for Demographic Equity in Grid-Interactive Buildings
- 2026BuildOcc: A Large Language Model Occupant Agent Platform for Building Energy Research
- 2026Large Language Model-Driven Context-Aware Eco-Feedback Generation and Evaluation