HELIOS: An LLM-Driven Autonomous Indirect Trajectory Optimization Agent
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-thrust trajectory optimization is a core technology in deep-space mission design. Indirect methods based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle (PMP) offer rigorous optimality guarantees, yet their practical application faces three bottlenecks: (1) transversality conditions must be derived case by case for each constraint type; (2) different dynamics models require repeated code rewrites; and (3) shooting equations are highly sensitive to initial guesses. This paper presents HELIOS (Heuristic Engine for Low-thrust Interplanetary Optimization System), a trajectory optimization agent built around a large language model (LLM). Given a physical problem described in natural language, the system autonomously performs PMP symbolic derivation, SymPy verification, C++ shooting-code generation, and numerical solution without human intervention. Key innovations include: (1) a constraint-adaptive derivation framework that unifies arbitrary constraints into psi(x,p)=0 form and automatically generates stationarity conditions for free parameters (e.g., gravity-assist turning angle); (2) dynamics-adaptive four-module code generation supporting non-standard dynamics (solar sail, J2 perturbation) without modifying the underlying template; and (3) a general derivation rule set covering critical error-prone points in PMP derivation. Experiments on 11 progressive test scenarios show that HELIOS correctly derives and solves problems from simple rendezvous (8 variables) to multi-leg stay transfers (48 variables), gravity-assist trajectories (17 variables), and solar-sail minimum-time transfers (8 variables). The best compilation success rate reaches 100% (11/11). A multi-model comparison (8 open-source LLM backends, total scores 250-905) verifies the model-agnostic architecture and reveals a positive correlation between model scale and derivation capability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
4 of 37 references.
References · 4
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Can LLMs Do Rocket Science? Exploring the Limits of Complex Reasoning with GTOC 12
- 2024LLMSat: A Large Language Model-Based Goal-Oriented Agent for Autonomous Space Exploration
- 2026OrbitTAMP: Grounding Language Models for Task and Motion Planning in Spacecraft Rendezvous
- 2025Global Search for Optimal Low Thrust Spacecraft Trajectories using Diffusion Models and the Indirect Method
- 2024Language Models are Spacecraft Operators
- 2026Agentic AutoResearch forSpace Autonomy: An Auditable, LLM-Driven Research Agent for Aerospace Control Problems
- 2024Fine-tuning LLMs for Autonomous Spacecraft Control: A Case Study Using Kerbal Space Program
- 2025LLMs for Engineering: Teaching Models to Design High Powered Rockets