mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Traceable LLM Reasoning for Fake-Order Fraud Detection

arXiv 2607.23075 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting fake-order fraud at scale remains a critical challenge for large online-to-offline (O2O) service platforms, as existing approaches often rely on expert-designed features, produce black-box decisions, and provide limited interpretability. To address these limitations, we propose DeepScrub, a reinforcement learning framework built upon large language models (LLMs) for fake-order fraud detection with traceable reasoning. DeepScrub introduces three innovations. First, a semantic unification module converts heterogeneous risk signals into textual descriptions that LLMs can understand. Second, continued pre-training on risk-control corpora injects domain knowledge, and task rewards jointly evaluate prediction correctness and reasoning quality. Third, the SUggest-REflect (SURE) mechanism incorporates expert feedback and model self-checking to iteratively refine reasoning paths. On a real-world fake-order fraud detection dataset, DeepScrub achieves a macro-F1 score of 85.3%, outperforming the best baseline by 2.7 percentage points. Our task-optimized 8B model further surpasses a 32B model, showing that domain adaptation can matter more than model scale in this setting. In a four-week live pilot, DeepScrub achieved 91.8% precision and 88.5% recall, improving over first-stage human reviewers by 16.6 and 38.8 percentage points. It reduced first-stage manual review workload by 94% and saved nearly one million RMB annually. These results show that DeepScrub improves fraud review accuracy, reduces first-stage review workload, and provides traceable evidence for production risk-review workflows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.

Builds on

12 of 29 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  5. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  6. 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 397
  7. 2024SWIFT:A Scalable lightWeight Infrastructure for Fine-Tuningcited by 355
  8. 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidancecited by 281
  9. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
  10. 2025MOON Embedding: Multimodal Representation Learning for E-commerce Search Advertisingcited by 5
  11. 2026MOON3.0: Reasoning-aware Multimodal Representation Learning for E-commerce Product Understandingcited by 4
  12. 2026CausalTAD: Injecting Causal Knowledge into Large Language Models for Tabular Anomaly Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reinforcement Learning of Large Language Models for Interpretable Credit Card Fraud Detection
  2. 2026SAGE: An LLM-driven Self Reflective Agentic Framework for Fraud Detection
  3. 2025LLM-Enhanced Self-Evolving Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Step E-Commerce Payment Fraud Risk Detection
  4. 2025Understanding Structured Financial Data with LLMs: A Case Study on Fraud Detection
  5. 2026SR-Fraud: An Outcome-Supervised Reflective LLM Agent Framework for Non-Stationary Payment Fraud Detection
  6. 2026Autonomous Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Graph-Based Fraud Detection
  7. 2026Behavior-Grounded Semantic Enrichment for Financial Fraud Modeling and Reasoning
  8. 2025Can Multi-modal (reasoning) LLMs detect document manipulation?