Multi-Agent Privacy Game in Federated Learning: A Unified Mean-Field View
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without centralising their data, yet privacy remains a persistent concern because the shared model updates can leak information about local datasets. Existing privacy-preserving methods either inject calibrated noise into client updates, limiting their composition guarantees, or formulate client privacy choices as a multi-agent game whose Nash equilibrium becomes intractable as the number of clients grows. We bridge these two lines of work by formulating privacy-preserving federated learning as a mean-field privacy game: each client strategically chooses its own privacy budget while interacting with the population only through a single mean-field statistic. The mean-field limit yields a tractable equilibrium for arbitrarily many clients, accommodates heterogeneous client preferences, and inherits an exponentially decaying privacy guarantee through a log-Sobolev contraction. The framework recovers the entropic privacy baseline as the homogeneous special case and the multi-agent privacy game as the finite-population case. Experiments on quadratic regression, logistic regression, and MNIST demonstrate that the proposed framework attains the privacy-utility trade-off of the entropic baseline while delivering a personalized privacy guarantee that the homogeneous baseline cannot express.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 208
- 2020Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution Shiftscited by 102
- 2019A Machine Learning Framework for Solving High-Dimensional Mean Field Game and Mean Field Control Problemscited by 95
3 more
- 2020Trading Data For Learning: Incentive Mechanism For On-Device Federated Learningcited by 21
- 2021Federated Learning as a Mean-Field Gamecited by 4
- 2024Federated Learning with Differential Privacycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.