mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Agent Privacy Game in Federated Learning: A Unified Mean-Field View

arXiv 2607.23029 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without centralising their data, yet privacy remains a persistent concern because the shared model updates can leak information about local datasets. Existing privacy-preserving methods either inject calibrated noise into client updates, limiting their composition guarantees, or formulate client privacy choices as a multi-agent game whose Nash equilibrium becomes intractable as the number of clients grows. We bridge these two lines of work by formulating privacy-preserving federated learning as a mean-field privacy game: each client strategically chooses its own privacy budget while interacting with the population only through a single mean-field statistic. The mean-field limit yields a tractable equilibrium for arbitrarily many clients, accommodates heterogeneous client preferences, and inherits an exponentially decaying privacy guarantee through a log-Sobolev contraction. The framework recovers the entropic privacy baseline as the homogeneous special case and the multi-agent privacy game as the finite-population case. Experiments on quadratic regression, logistic regression, and MNIST demonstrate that the proposed framework attains the privacy-utility trade-off of the entropic baseline while delivering a personalized privacy guarantee that the homogeneous baseline cannot express.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.

Builds on

15 of 34 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  6. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  7. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  8. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
  9. 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
  10. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 208
  11. 2020Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution Shiftscited by 102
  12. 2019A Machine Learning Framework for Solving High-Dimensional Mean Field Game and Mean Field Control Problemscited by 95
3 more
  1. 2020Trading Data For Learning: Incentive Mechanism For On-Device Federated Learningcited by 21
  2. 2021Federated Learning as a Mean-Field Gamecited by 4
  3. 2024Federated Learning with Differential Privacycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.