mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Learning with Differential Privacy

arXiv 2402.02230 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL), as a type of distributed machine learning, is capable of significantly preserving client's private data from being shared among different parties. Nevertheless, private information can still be divulged by analyzing uploaded parameter weights from clients. In this report, we showcase our empirical benchmark of the effect of the number of clients and the addition of differential privacy (DP) mechanisms on the performance of the model on different types of data. Our results show that non-i.i.d and small datasets have the highest decrease in performance in a distributed and differentially private setting.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2024.

Builds on

6 of 9 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  3. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
  4. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  5. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  6. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.