mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Grading in Large Language Models

arXiv 2607.22757 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Graded Large Language Models (GLLMs), an algebraic framework that equips the representation space of a transformer with a grading and propagates the induced weighted scalar action through embeddings, self-attention, and the training objective. The construction extends the theory of graded neural networks and graded transformers to autoregressive language models while preserving expressive power, asymptotic computational complexity, and inference cost. The governing geometric picture is that of geometric invariant theory. The benefit of a grading is expressed by a Kempf--Ness functional on the grading torus; the grades that improve upon the uniform architecture form an open convex cone whose membership is decided by a Hilbert--Mumford-type criterion pairing a grade direction against two measurable profiles of the target and the data; the optimal grades are the coincidence point of two moment maps, given in closed form; and the ordinary transformer appears as a semistable isotropic point on the boundary of the cone: one member of a larger graded family rather than a distinguished optimum. Separately, for level-stratified targets we prove a minimax separation between the graded prior and its absence: over all estimators the risks of the graded and uniform target classes separate throughout an explicit window of sample sizes, by a factor that decays exponentially in the number of levels under geometric stratification. Both profiles are estimable offline, so the optimal grades solve a convex program certified before training begins. Because the grading is absorbed into the learned parameters after training, every GLLM compiles to a standard transformer of identical architecture and inference complexity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,986
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,494
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,624
  5. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,021
  6. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,658
  7. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,972
  8. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,910
  9. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,499
  10. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,379
  11. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,979
  12. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,759
10 more
  1. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,449
  2. 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,307
  3. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,289
  4. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 910
  5. 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 820
  6. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 520
  7. 2022SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequencescited by 170
  8. 2025Graded Neural Networkscited by 4
  9. 2024Artificial Neural Networks on Graded Vector Spacescited by 3
  10. 2025Internalizing Tools as Morphisms in Graded Transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.