mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepLens Diagnosis Agent: Agentic Workflow Design Lets a Small Reasoning Model Compete with Frontier LLMs

arXiv 2607.22555 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Medical diagnosis is a multi-stage process: extract facts, consult knowledge, generate a differential analysis, and select the best diagnosis with explanations. Frontier LLMs are strong generalists, but single-shot prompting often yields brittle diagnostic reasoning. We present the DeepLens Diagnosis Agent, a five-stage harnessing pipeline (combining model capabilities with disciplined process constraints) centered on a small medical reasoning model (JSL Medical Small 7B v2) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The pipeline enforces structured clinical extraction, disciplined retrieval, constrained candidate generation, explicit evidence triangulation, and an auditable final decision. On the 915-case DiagnosisArena benchmark, the agent achieved 60.14% top-1 diagnostic accuracy, the highest among small and medium-sized models. The same model without the agent workflow achieved 23.99%, a +36-point gain from workflow design alone, despite 88.2% on standard medical benchmarks, showing that diagnostic reasoning under uncertainty requires more than knowledge recall. The agent costs USD 0.0072 per case (24K tokens on A100) with 24-second latency, 35-45% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 (USD 0.0110) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (USD 0.0128) while outperforming them by +9.70pp and +9.17pp. Harnessing can also correct frontier model failures; workflow constraints can outweigh parameter count or API cost. Beyond aggregate accuracy, the pipeline produces structured intermediate artifacts that make each stage inspectable and support error localization. These properties support high-stakes settings where traceability, reproducibility, and auditable evidence matter alongside benchmark performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

10 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025OctoMed: Data Recipes for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Medical Reasoning28 Nov
  2. 2025DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models20 May

Other references · 8

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 398
  8. 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 319

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EviDx: Evidence-Aware Active Diagnosis with Scaffolded LLM Agents
  2. 2025End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning
  3. 2026GraphDx: A Cost-Aware Knowledge-Enhanced Multi-Agent Framework for Sequential Diagnosis
  4. 2025MedAgent-Pro: Towards Evidence-based Multi-modal Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflow
  5. 2025MEDDxAgent: A Unified Modular Agent Framework for Explainable Automatic Differential Diagnosis
  6. 2026MDIA: A Multi-Agent Diagnostic Intelligence Pipeline on HealthBench Professional
  7. 2025An Agentic System for Rare Disease Diagnosis with Traceable Reasoning
  8. 2026MeDxAgent: Multi-Agent Consultation for Interactive Medical Diagnosis