Rethinking Multi-Branch and Cross-Backbone Fusion for Vehicle Re-Identification under Foundation-Model Pretraining

Multi-branch architectures and CNN-Transformer fusion are widely believed to improve vehicle re-identification (Re-ID) by combining complementary representations. We revisit this for a DINOv3-pretrained backbone. A single DINOv3-pretrained ConvNeXt with a tuned recipe reaches 88.19 mAP on VeRi-Wild Small and 77.47 on Large from visual cues alone, within the combined evaluation and optimization noise of the strongest protocol-verified metadata-dependent multi-branch baseline, and 92.38/83.68 with training-free re-ranking. Using this baseline and retrieval-level branch diagnostics, we ask whether representational diversity still pays at this scale. In our runs, it does not. Across both benchmarks and every converged configuration, concatenating multiple heads over a shared backbone moves the best single head by under one mAP point in either direction while costing four times the embedding dimension; 99.7% of the concatenation's variance lies in 512 principal components, so the heads not only duplicate one another but each occupies a quarter of its nominal 2048 dimensions. Pushing diversity to its architectural limit, CNN versus Transformer, we grant fusion every advantage through an asymmetric frozen-anchor scheme. Every Transformer configuration still lands at least 13 mAP below the ConvNeXt backbone (13-15 for the two strongest, up to 46 for the weakest), and a paired per-query bootstrap bounds the fusion gain at +0.11 mAP (95% CI) even for the most favourable snapshot we obtained. One strong backbone with the right recipe and re-ranking is the efficiency frontier. All results use single-seed training and one foundation-model family; differences of this size are therefore reported as bounds rather than orderings, and we list falsifiers.