Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring safety in reinforcement learning under nonstationarity requires determining whether a learning system can safely adapt to forecasted environmental change within the required recovery horizon. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods typically assume stationary environments and do not explicitly consider adaptation speed as a safety concern. However, when environments evolve over time, delayed adaptation may result in transient unsafe behavior. This paper proposes adjustment speed as a safety constraint for nonstationary reinforcement learning. The central idea is to define safety in terms of adaptation feasibility: future states or regions may become unsafe when the adaptation required to remain safe exceeds the learning system's calibrated recovery capacity. The proposed framework uses learned context representations and short-horizon context forecasts to estimate adaptation demand and compare it with the agent's achievable adaptation capacity. When predicted adaptation demand exceeds the calibrated recovery capacity, the framework proactively tightens the admissible action set and activates an action-level shield to reduce unsafe behavior before violations occur. Experiments in a nonstationary driving environment show that the proposed approach primarily reduces safety violations in short-horizon windows aligned with context changes. Ablation studies further show that shielding is more conservative for peak- and tail-risk suppression, while optimization-level adjustment provides additional reductions in short-horizon switch-conditioned violations. These results support adaptation feasibility as a practical safety principle for reinforcement learning under nonstationarity and demonstrate that proactive intervention can improve safety during periods of environmental change.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 20 references.
References · 16
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
- 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
- 2018Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments Through Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 270
- 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
- 2015Contextual Markov Decision Processescited by 213
- 2023Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
4 more
- 2018A predictive safety filter for learning-based control of constrained nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 91
- 2021Context-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 33
- 2024A Study of Plasticity Loss in On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2021Improved Robustness and Safety for Pre-Adaptation of Meta Reinforcement Learning with Prior Regularizationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.