mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Polynomial Architecture-Attribution Co-Design Framework for Exact Aumann-Shapley Attribution in GNNs

arXiv 2607.21094 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study feature-level and node-level explanations for graph neural networks (GNNs) through the lens of Aumann-Shapley attribution. Path-integral methods such as Integrated Gradients provide an axiomatic formulation of attribution, but their practical use in deep GNNs typically relies on finite-sample numerical approximations to the path integral, requiring a trade-off between quadrature error and computational cost. This paper proposes APEX, a model-attribution co-design framework that makes the attribution integral exactly computable under a polynomial GNN architecture. The key component is PolyGIN, a GIN-style graph network whose message-passing, normalization, and transformation operations preserve a bounded multivariate polynomial form for scalar model scores, such as pre-softmax logits. We show that, for a PolyGIN with L polynomial transformation blocks, the derivative along the attribution path has degree at most 2L-1. Therefore, Gauss--Legendre quadrature can evaluate the Aumann--Shapley path integral exactly, up to floating-point precision, with 2L-1 deterministic evaluation points. The resulting attributions can be computed at the feature level and then aggregated into node-level scores while preserving completeness. Experiments on synthetic and real-world graph benchmarks show that PolyGIN maintains competitive predictive performance, while the complete APEX framework achieves higher attribution fidelity than the compared baselines and substantially reduces the number of evaluations required for path integration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  2. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
  5. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
  6. 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 881
  7. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  8. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 714
  9. 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
  10. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 384
  11. 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
  12. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
7 more
  1. 2021On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorationscited by 281
  2. 2019On the Expressive Power of Deep Polynomial Neural Networkscited by 66
  3. 2022GraphFramEx: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networkscited by 58
  4. 2020Pi-nets: Deep Polynomial Neural Networkscited by 39
  5. 2021Fast Axiomatic Attribution for Neural Networkscited by 35
  6. 2022FlowX: Towards Explainable Graph Neural Networks via Message Flowscited by 21
  7. 2023Towards Robust Fidelity for Evaluating Explainability of Graph Neural Networkscited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.