mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Delivery, Not Storage: Cue-Anchored Working Memory as a Harness Property for Coding Agents

arXiv 2607.20972 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Coding agents ship with one kind of memory: documents. Instruction files, plan artifacts, and auto-written memory directories are deliberately authored and deliberately retrieved: the agent must choose to write them and choose to read them back. Human expertise runs on a second tier that never gets written down: situationally-bound operational facts (gotchas, locations, local conventions) encoded as a side effect of the work and retrieved involuntarily when the situation cues them. We argue this second tier is the load-bearing one for long-running agents and must be a harness property, not an agent choice. We contribute: (1) a two-tier design theory grounded in the cognitive literature on memory offloading, incidental encoding, and event-based prospective memory, each mapped to an architectural requirement; (2) a cue-anchored memory model where memories carry first-class trigger conditions over a composable vocabulary (path, symbol, semantic, event, temporal), evaluated deterministically by the harness, a composition no surveyed academic or shipped system provides; (3) a controlled evaluation on a real coding task showing that voluntary memory use is near zero even with a pre-seeded store (0 memory operations in 114 turns), that deterministic injection delivered in every seeded run with zero false alarms, and that 39% of intra-session re-reads re-buy content paid for before a compaction boundary; (4) a repeated-compaction decay probe: ten facts held only in conversation vanish at the first summary and stay absent from 106 of 108 compactions, and the deprived agent greps the harness's own session files to rebuild them, while the same facts injected from a harness-owned store arrive intact through all 138 compact-resumes as the final summary carries none. Delivery, not storage, is the product: the reliable memory channel for agents is the one the agent never has to think about.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Are We Ready For An Agent-Native Memory System?23 Jun
  2. 2026RecMem: Recurrence-based Memory Consolidation for Efficient and Effective Long-Running LLM Agents15 May
  3. 2026Governing Evolving Memory in LLM Agents: Risks, Mechanisms, and the Stability and Safety Governed Memory (SSGM) Framework12 Mar
  4. 2026Beyond Static Summarization: Proactive Memory Extraction for LLM Agents8 Jan
  5. 2025MEMTRACK: Evaluating Long-Term Memory and State Tracking in Multi-Platform Dynamic Agent Environments1 Oct
  6. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory28 Apr
  7. 2025Zep: A Temporal Knowledge Graph Architecture for Agent Memory20 Jan

Other references · 4

  1. 2023Recursively Summarizing Enables Long-Term Dialogue Memory in Large Language Modelscited by 62
  2. 2026SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositoriescited by 20
  3. 2026User as Code: Executable Memory for Personalized Agentscited by 7
  4. 2026PROJECTMEM: A Local-First, Event-Sourced Memory and Judgment Layer for AI Coding Agentscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Measure Before You Manage: Evaluating Agent Working Memory in Coding Agents
  2. 2026What to Keep, What to Forget: A Rate--Distortion View of Memory Compaction in LLMs and Agents
  3. 2026A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents
  4. 2026Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents
  5. 2026Prompt-Induced Waste in Coding Agents: Reasoning, Effort, Harness Design, and End-to-End Cost
  6. 2026Shared Organizational Memory for Enterprise Coding Agents: System Design and Deployment Snapshot
  7. 2025How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behavior
  8. 2026Do Context Files Help Coding Agents? A Two-Agent Ablation Study on Real Repositories