mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scaling Closed-Loop Feature Channel Configuration with LLMs

arXiv 2607.20516 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Promising initial results in closed-loop large-language-model-based channel-configuration search demonstrated that neural-network widths can be optimized directly through executable code generation and accuracy feedback. However, those results were obtained from a relatively sparse set of valid evaluations, leaving open whether the observed optimization behavior transfers to a denser sampling regime and whether additional architectural regularities emerge when more generated networks are evaluated. To test this, the same search setting is scaled to 250 candidate networks per fine-tuning cycle. The analysis covers 2000 generated candidates from 8 complete cycles, yielding 462 verified CIFAR-100 evaluations after task and metadata filtering. Per-cycle mean accuracy exhibits a positive linear trend with slope 9.87e-4 (p=0.043), while the high-performing frontier improves more strongly: the best observed accuracy increases from 0.3144 to 0.3676, and both the top-5 and top-10 cycle-level means exhibit positive trends. The scaled run also reveals improved parameter efficiency. The best model reaches 0.3676 with 11.8M parameters, compared with an early high-performing model at 0.3144 with 166.5M parameters. Beyond accuracy, the larger sample exposes architectural regularities that were difficult to assess from sparse observations. Non-power-of-two channel widths occur in 41.8% of verified candidates, and the strongest models share structured channel-allocation patterns characterized by moderate early widths and expanded middle or later blocks. These findings indicate that the channel-search signal observed in the initial study transfers

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 22 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  3. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  4. 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 673
  5. 2018AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devicescited by 375
  6. 2019MetaPruning: Meta Learning for Automatic Neural Network Channel Pruningcited by 226
  7. 2021Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAScited by 194
  8. 2023EvoPrompting: Language Models for Code-Level Neural Architecture Searchcited by 129
  9. 2019Evaluating the Search Phase of Neural Architecture Searchcited by 120
  10. 2023LLMatic: Neural Architecture Search via Large Language Models and Quality Diversity Optimizationcited by 86
  11. 2023Can GPT-4 Perform Neural Architecture Search?cited by 74
  12. 2020EcoNAS: Finding Proxies for Economical Neural Architecture Searchcited by 61
6 more
  1. 2025LEMUR Neural Network Dataset: Towards Seamless AutoMLcited by 20
  2. 2024Design Principle Transfer in Neural Architecture Search via Large Language Modelscited by 14
  3. 2018AIRNet: Self-Supervised Affine Registration for 3D Medical Images using Neural Networkscited by 12
  4. 2025SEKI: Self-Evolution and Knowledge Inspiration based Neural Architecture Search via Large Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2025CoLLM-NAS: Collaborative Large Language Models for Efficient Knowledge-Guided Neural Architecture Searchcited by 6
  6. 2026Closed-Loop LLM Discovery of Non-Standard Channel Priors in Vision Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.