THOR: A Theta-Gamma Hierarchical Oscillatory Reasoning Framework for Multi-hop QA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-hop question answering requires retrieving and integrating evidence from multiple contexts. Despite the rapid progress of current research, multi-hop reasoning remains constrained by two persistent limitations: attention decay, where the model's focus on main question degrades as the reasoning chain grows, and error accumulation, where mistakes propagate across hops and compounds into final failure. Inspired by Theta-Gamma hierarchical oscillation which decouples global planning from local retrieval, enabling efficient attention transfer between hops and a verification and repair mechanism that interrupts the accumulation of errors in the wrong paths, we present THOR, a brain-inspired Theta-Gamma hierarchical oscillatory reasoning framework. Extensive comparative experiments and specific validation experiments on multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that THOR improves answer accuracy and robustness while mitigating limitations, showcasing its generalization across different backbones.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
References · 16
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
- 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 911
- 2023Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergycited by 343
- 2024Chain of Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context Taskscited by 201
- 2024KAG: Boosting LLMs in Professional Domains via Knowledge Augmented Generationcited by 67
- 2019Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QAcited by 63
- 2023Self-prompted Chain-of-Thought on Large Language Models for Open-domain Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 21
4 more
- 2023Probabilistic Tree-of-thought Reasoning for Answering Knowledge-intensive Complex Questionscited by 19
- 2025ReAgent: Reversible Multi-Agent Reasoning for Knowledge-Enhanced Multi-Hop QAcited by 12
- 2025PRISM: Agentic Retrieval with LLMs for Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 7
- 2025Multi-Hop Question Answering: When Can Humans Help, and Where do They Struggle?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Retrieval--Reasoning Processes for Multi-hop Question Answering: A Four-Axis Design Framework and Empirical Trends
- 2026Metacognitive Behavioral Tuning of Large Language Models for Multi-Hop Question Answering
- 2025Multi-granular Training Strategies for Robust Multi-hop Reasoning Over Noisy and Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources
- 2025Hop, Skip, and Overthink: Diagnosing Why Reasoning Models Fumble during Multi-Hop Analysis
- 2024BeamAggR: Beam Aggregation Reasoning over Multi-source Knowledge for Multi-hop Question Answering
- 2025A Fano-Style Accuracy Upper Bound for LLM Single-Pass Reasoning in Multi-Hop QA
- 2026Locally Sound, Globally Insufficient: The Local-Global Gap in Multi-Hop Reasoning
- 2023PokeMQA: Programmable knowledge editing for Multi-hop Question Answering