mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Thermodynamics-Informed Input Reparameterization for Neural Prediction of Real-Fluid Thermodynamic Properties in Supercritical Combustion

arXiv 2607.19241 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.LG physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyncited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-fluid thermodynamic property evaluation is a major computational cost in supercritical combustion simulations. In the enthalpy-based pressure-correction formulation, the closure evaluates temperature T, density ρ, and compressibility coefficient psi from the solver state (h,p,Y) through enthalpy-temperature inversion and repeated real-fluid equation-of-state evaluations. Neural-network surrogates offer fixed-cost inference, but direct mapping from (h,p,Y) to (T,ρ,psi) must capture the enthalpy-temperature relation and non-ideal equation-of-state response, resulting in a complex regression problem. This work introduces a thermodynamics-informed input reparameterization strategy, termed target-aligned input reparameterization (TAIR). TAIR replaces the raw enthalpy coordinate of each property network with a target-matched thermodynamic coordinate: the temperature network uses a temperature estimate obtained by inverting a constant-cp ideal-gas mixture enthalpy approximation, whereas the density and compressibility networks use an ideal-gas density estimate. These algebraic transformations use only solver-available variables and species constants, guiding the networks to learn real-fluid departures from ideal-gas baselines rather than reconstructing the full closure from raw enthalpy. The method is assessed using supercritical methane-oxygen counterflow flame data against a raw-input baseline and target-inconsistent cross-reparameterization controls. TAIR reduces held-out RMSE by factors of about 1.5, 2.0, and 7.5 for T, ρ, and psi, respectively. For an unseen strain-rate flame within the augmented thermodynamic envelope, the corresponding factors are 3.6, 14.5, and 6.0. The target-inconsistent controls perform worse, indicating that the gains arise from thermodynamically matched input design rather than generic preprocessing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

7 of 39 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  4. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  5. 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
  6. 2016Robust Large Margin Deep Neural Networkscited by 117
  7. 2019Acceleration of the NVT-flash calculation for multicomponent mixtures using deep neural network modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.