mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting Activities in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions with Hybrid Machine Learning

arXiv 2607.19114 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.LG physics.chem-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Activities in aqueous electrolyte solutions, usually described by ionic activity and osmotic coefficients, are important properties for modeling many processes in industry and nature. Established activity models, such as those of Pitzer or Bromley, require fitting to experimental data for each electrolyte of interest and thus cannot predict properties for unstudied systems. While some predictive approaches exist, they are typically limited in scope and rely on additional ion-specific descriptors. In this work, we introduce a new hybrid model that combines the physics-based Bromley model with a matrix completion method (MCM) from machine learning. The MCM is employed to predict the electrolyte-specific parameters of the Bromley model, exploiting the fact that these parameters can be arranged in a matrix with cations and anions as rows and columns, respectively. Due to the lack of experimental data for many electrolytes, the initial parameter matrix is sparsely populated, making the prediction of the Bromley parameters for unstudied electrolytes a matrix completion problem. The hybrid model, Bromley-MCM, was trained end-to-end on experimental data for mean ionic activity coefficients and osmotic coefficients of aqueous solutions of 478 electrolytes at 298 K from the Dortmund Data Bank. As output, we obtain a completed matrix of Bromley parameters for 83 cations and 112 anions, enabling consistent prediction of concentration-dependent activities in aqueous solutions of 9,296 electrolytes at 298~K. This substantially extends the applicability of the Bromley model while maintaining high predictive accuracy, as demonstrated through evaluations on electrolytes excluded from model training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 47 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  2. 2016Automatic Differentiation Variational Inferencecited by 159
  3. 2020Machine Learning in Thermodynamics: Prediction of Activity Coefficients by Matrix Completioncited by 19
  4. 2024HANNA: Hard-constraint Neural Network for Consistent Activity Coefficient Predictioncited by 17
  5. 2022Hybridizing Physical and Data-driven Prediction Methods for Physicochemical Propertiescited by 9
  6. 2024Advancing Thermodynamic Group-Contribution Methods by Machine Learning: UNIFAC 2.0cited by 7
  7. 2025GRAPPA -- A Hybrid Graph Neural Network for Predicting Pure Component Vapor Pressurescited by 6
  8. 2024Hierarchical Matrix Completion for the Prediction of Properties of Binary Mixturescited by 4
  9. 2024Balancing Molecular Information and Empirical Data in the Prediction of Physico-Chemical Propertiescited by 3
  10. 2025Thermodynamically consistent machine learning model for excess Gibbs energycited by 3
  11. 2026Prediction of Diffusion Coefficients in Mixtures with Tensor Completioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.