mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Multi-kernel Learning for Automated Algorithm Selection

arXiv 2607.19031 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated algorithm selection in black-box optimization typically relies on supervised models that map landscape features to algorithm performance labels. Such models are costly to train, benchmark-dependent, and often fail to generalize to unseen problem classes. We study an unsupervised alternative: multi-kernel clustering over heterogeneous landscape representations, in which problem instances are grouped without using performance labels in the clustering stage, and the resulting clusters are mapped post hoc to solver recommendations through a strictly separated three-stage evaluation protocol. Drawing on two decades of advances in multiple kernel learning, we adopt a multi-kernel k-means formulation that jointly learns cluster assignments and kernel weights over four heterogeneous landscape views: ELA, DeepELA, DoE2Vec, and TransOptAS. On affine BBOB-derived selector tasks for Differential Evolution (DE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) at a fixed evaluation budget, we report mean plus or minus standard deviation selector profiles over 50 independent random seeds for stochastic configurations. Multi-kernel clustering obtains the strongest mean profile on the DE portfolio and remains competitive with, and nominally ahead of, the leading baselines on the more compressed PSO portfolio, where differences among the best methods are small relative to stochastic variation. In representative median-seed runs used for visualization, the learned kernel weights retain ELA and TransOptAS while assigning zero weight to DeepELA and DoE2Vec, providing a task-specific interpretation of which representations are retained by the multi-kernel model for selector-oriented grouping.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

12 of 33 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 138
  2. 2018Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectivescited by 114
  3. 2017Automated Algorithm Selection on Continuous Black-Box Problems By Combining Exploratory Landscape Analysis and Machine Learningcited by 33
  4. 2023DoE2Vec: Deep-learning Based Features for Exploratory Landscape Analysiscited by 12
  5. 2020Extreme Algorithm Selection With Dyadic Feature Representationcited by 11
  6. 2022SELECTOR: Selecting a Representative Benchmark Suite for Reproducible Statistical Comparisoncited by 11
  7. 2023Comparing Algorithm Selection Approaches on Black-Box Optimization Problemscited by 10
  8. 2024Deep-ELA: Deep Exploratory Landscape Analysis with Self-Supervised Pretrained Transformers for Single- and Multi-Objective Continuous Optimization Problemscited by 9
  9. 2025Landscape Features in Single-Objective Continuous Optimization: Have We Hit a Wall in Algorithm Selection Generalization?cited by 7
  10. 2023Using Affine Combinations of BBOB Problems for Performance Assessmentcited by 5
  11. 2023Assessing the Generalizability of a Performance Predictive Modelcited by 4
  12. 2024Generalization Ability of Feature-based Performance Prediction Models: A Statistical Analysis across Benchmarkscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.