mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stale but Stable: Staleness-Adaptive Trust Regions for Stabilizing Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2607.18722 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE in reinforcement learning and robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Asynchronous reinforcement learning improves throughput by decoupling rollout generation from optimization, but the resulting staleness is an inevitable byproduct, compounded jointly by policy lag, engine delays, and mixture-of-experts routing. From a trust-region perspective, this mismatch is critical: in the finite-horizon improvement bound, training-inference divergence governs the approximation error, whereas PPO clipping only gates sampled outward updates and therefore acts as a sampled surrogate rather than a full-policy constraint. As a result, the high-staleness update can remain weakly controlled in exactly the asynchronous regime where stale rollouts matter most. We introduce the Staleness-Adaptive Trust Region (SAT), which uses the detached sampled log-ratio as a practical staleness proxy, identifies the high-mismatch tail within each batch through Staleness-based kernel function scaling, and contracts only the sign-selected endpoint of the nominal PPO interval using Effective contraction factors. This design preserves the baseline behavior on ordinary tokens, while making the update more conservative exactly on newly intercepted outward bands. We evaluate SAT in a fully decoupled asynchronous reinforcement learning setup built on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Base, leveraging SGLang as the inference engine and Megatron as the training pipeline. In this setting, SAT-GSPO w/ R3 attains the best observed AIME24 avg@8, reaching 35.83 at lag 1 and 34.79 at lag 8, while SAT-GSPO reaches 34.17 at lag 1. More broadly, the results indicate that aligning the clip interval with observed staleness heterogeneity is an effective way to stabilize the reported asynchronous regime.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE in reinforcement learning and robotics, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices1 Dec
  2. 2025Stabilizing MoE Reinforcement Learning by Aligning Training and Inference Routers13 Oct
  3. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimization24 Jul

Other references · 11

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  6. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  7. 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
  8. 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 236
  9. 2026Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  10. 2026Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  11. 2026Rethinking the Divergence Regularization in LLM RLcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Where Does Staleness Accumulate? Pool Aware Effective Staleness Control for Asynchronous RL in LLM Post-Training
  2. 2026Stable Asynchrony: Variance-Controlled Off-Policy RL for LLMs
  3. 2025A-3PO: Accelerating Asynchronous LLM Training with Staleness-aware Proximal Policy Approximation
  4. 2026Beyond Uniform Token-Level Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Prosperity before Collapse: How Far Can Off-Policy RL Reach with Stale Data on LLMs?
  6. 2026Staleness-Learning Rate Scaling Laws for Asynchronous RLHF
  7. 2026Missing Old Logits in Asynchronous Agentic RL: Semantic Mismatch and Repair Methods for Off-Policy Correction
  8. 2026Asynchronous Is Nearly Free for Evolution Strategies on Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks