mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Testing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with Chunk Coverage

arXiv 2607.18155 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.SEcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based systemsfootnoteFor brevity, RAG-based systems are referred to as RAG systems throughout this paper. are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings where correct behaviour depends not only on the language model but also on the retrieval component that selects external documents at inference time. While existing RAG evaluation metrics assess retrieval and generation quality on a per-query basis, typically relying on query-level test oracles such as reference answers or relevance annotations, they provide limited insight into whether a test suite adequately exercises the retrieval behaviour of the system as a whole. In this paper, we introduce Chunk Coverage (CC), an oracle-independent test adequacy criterion for testing the retrieval component of RAG systems. CC measures the fraction of corpus chunks that are retrieved at least once across a test suite, providing a structural view of which parts of the retrieval space have been exercised. We further show how CC can be used to guide test selection and generation by prioritising queries that expand coverage of previously unexercised retrieval regions. We evaluate CC on clinical and financial RAG system scenarios. CC-guided testing reaches 50% of attainable coverage 1.7x faster than random selection and 4.2x faster than redundancy-biased strategies. Moreover, CC improves fault detection effectiveness (APFD) by 10% to 25% over random, indicating earlier discovery of distinct retrieval faults. These results show that CC captures retrieval diversity relevant to effective testing without requiring test oracles.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey21 Apr
  2. 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems16 Nov
  3. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation26 Sep

Other references · 13

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  4. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  5. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  6. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
  7. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
  8. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
  9. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  10. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
  11. 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
  12. 2022Towards Complex Document Understanding By Discrete Reasoningcited by 82
1 more
  1. 2025The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMscited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024CoFE-RAG: A Comprehensive Full-chain Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Enhanced Data Diversity
  2. 2026Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations
  3. 2025Stronger Baselines for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-Context Language Models
  4. 2026A Systems-Level Analysis of Sensitivity, Robustness, and Stability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2024Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation System
  6. 2025Methodological Framework for Quantifying Semantic Test Coverage in RAG Systems
  7. 2024RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2024XRAG: eXamining the Core -- Benchmarking Foundational Components in Advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation