mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Kernelized Linear Attention: Breaking the Capacity Wall with Symmetric Cones

arXiv 2607.17419 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Linear attention promises constant-time recurrent inference but degrades sharply on associative recall. We formulate attention recall as a spherical-packing problem and introduce Kernelized Linear Attention Activations (KATA), a framework whose feature maps are derived from first principles by certifying nonnegative attention weights through a self-dual homogeneous cone. Building on this observation, we show that rank-one positive semi-definite (PSD) features offer a favorable capacity--interference tradeoff. KATA recovers a parameter-free convex output gate and characterizes associative capacity through the Welch interference floor. For tolerances above this floor, KATA enlarges the state without adding parameters and admits spherical codes with exponentially many keys in the projection dimension. We implement KATA as fused Triton kernels at two operating points: a flash-attention-style forward up to ~1.6× FlashAttention-2 throughput, and an exact O(T) chunked-state form that reaches ~11× FlashAttention-2 forward throughput at 131k tokens. An associative scan of the first-order feature lowers the inter-chunk recurrence depth to O(log(T/C)) for chunk size C and averages ~2.4× the throughput of a matched sequential linear-attention baseline. On long-range MQAR and repeated-key overwrite, several KATA variants outperform Gated DeltaNet, with parameter counts and state sizes reported alongside accuracy. Induction preserves near-perfect recall, while kernel benchmarks show that the maps can be implemented efficiently. KATA retains 0.985 MQAR at a 16× out-of-distribution length, approaching the softmax with roughly one quarter of the KV-cache entries. Experiments on 340M-parameter LLMs reveal a feature-dependent fluency trade-off and clarify how positional embeddings, delta rules, and decay gates interact with feature geometry.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2026.

Builds on

30 of 50 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
  3. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  4. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
  5. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  6. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
  7. 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,283
  8. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  9. 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 814
  10. 2023Retentive Network: A Successor to Transformer for Large Language Modelscited by 594
  11. 2023Gated Linear Attention Transformers with Hardware-Efficient Trainingcited by 490
  12. 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 483
18 more
  1. 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 471
  2. 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 461
  3. 2024Parallelizing Linear Transformers with the Delta Rule over Sequence Lengthcited by 373
  4. 2018Efficient Attention: Attention with Linear Complexitiescited by 366
  5. 2021Random Feature Attentioncited by 350
  6. 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 303
  7. 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 266
  8. 2016Dense Associative Memory for Pattern Recognitioncited by 230
  9. 2022cosFormer: Rethinking Softmax in Attentioncited by 212
  10. 2024Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copyingcited by 208
  11. 2024Simple linear attention language models balance the recall-throughput tradeoffcited by 197
  12. 2022Transformer Quality in Linear Timecited by 189
  13. 2023Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Modelscited by 188
  14. 2025MoM: Linear Sequence Modeling with Mixture-of-Memoriescited by 44
  15. 2025Understanding Transformer from the Perspective of Associative Memorycited by 31
  16. 2025Critical attention scaling in long-context transformerscited by 17
  17. 2025LoLA: Low-Rank Linear Attention With Sparse Cachingcited by 10
  18. 2025Local Linear Attention: An Optimal Interpolation of Linear and Softmax Attention For Test-Time Regressioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Echo: KV-Cache-Free Associative Recall with Spectral Koopman Operators
  2. 2026DeltaLog: Deferred Materialization of Recurrent States for Linear Attention Decoding
  3. 2026RunningTensor: Generalizing Linear Attention to Higher-Order Recurrent States
  4. 2025Alleviating Forgetfulness of Linear Attention by Hybrid Sparse Attention and Contextualized Learnable Token Eviction
  5. 2025Element-wise Attention Is All You Need
  6. 2026Anatomy of Associative Recall in Fixed-State Recurrences: A Matched-State Decomposition, an Interference Wall, and a Curriculum That Breaks It
  7. 2026Learning to Forget Attention: Memory Consolidation for Adaptive Compute Reduction
  8. 2026SPHERICAL KV: Angle-Domain Attention and Rate-Distortion Retention for Efficient Long-Context Inference