Interpreting Quantum Learning Models via Stochastic Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum machine learning models define probabilistic input--output maps through coherent quantum evolution and measurement. While such models can exhibit computational advantages, their internal functioning and decision making generally resists interpretation in terms of stochastic trajectories through intermediate configurations. In contrast to classical (Markovian) stochastic processes, quantum dynamics generically violates the Chapman--Kolmogorov divisibility condition, preventing a decomposition into probabilistically meaningful intermediate transitions. We develop a probabilistic framework for representing quantum learning models as stochastic processes over configuration spaces where the dynamics are modeled as linear maps on probability distributions. Starting from a fixed POVM, arbitrary quantum channels induce transition kernels on the associated probability representation. For informationally complete POVMs, and in particular SIC-POVMs, these kernels are Markovian but generally quasi-stochastic, with non-classicality appearing as negativity. By contrast, projective spaces admit positive stochastic kernels but generally require non-Markovian dynamics due to the failure of Chapman--Kolmogorov divisibility. This yields a trade-off between negativity and dependence on past configurations, i.e. quantum dynamics can be represented either by Markovian quasi-stochastic maps or by positive stochastic processes with higher Markov order. We discuss how such representations of quantum dynamics can be interpreted as stochastic walks through a memory space in the spirit of Projective Simulation, a model of learning and agency in which decisions arise from random walks over an episodic memory network. We further outline how finite-order stochastic kernels can approximate such quantum deliberation processes and show in what regimes the classical machine learning model is recovered.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2026.
Builds on
6 of 29 references.
References · 6
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2017Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experimentscited by 41
- 2019Machine learning for long-distance quantum communicationcited by 10
- 2019How a minimal learning agent can infer the existence of unobserved variables in a complex environmentcited by 7
- 2013Projective simulation for classical learning agents: a comprehensive investigationcited by 6
- 2024Free Energy Projective Simulation (FEPS): Active inference with interpretabilitycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.