mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

KyrgyzLLM-Bench: Benchmarking Kyrgyz Language Understanding

arXiv 2607.17173 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) across languages remains challenging, as most multilingual benchmarks rely on translated English datasets, often obscuring linguistic and cultural specificity in the target language. This issue is particularly pronounced for less-resourced languages such as Kyrgyz, where reliable natively authored evaluation data are scarce. Building on previously introduced Kyrgyz-language evaluation datasets, this work reports the first systematic and large-scale evaluation of LLMs in Kyrgyz using the KyrgyzLLM-Bench benchmark suite. KyrgyzLLM-Bench comprises two natively authored datasets-KyrgyzMMLU and KyrgyzRC-together with carefully translated and manually post-edited versions of WinoGrande, HellaSwag, BoolQ, and TruthfulQA. We evaluate 26 open- and closed-source LLMs under zero-shot and few-shot settings, analyzing model performance, cross-lingual transfer, and the impact of translation artifacts on evaluation reliability. Across families and tasks, model rankings transfer broadly from English to Kyrgyz on WinoGrande and BoolQ, and to a lesser extent on MMLU, while HellaSwag exhibits a substantial English-Kyrgyz performance gap consistent with translation-induced plausibility shifts. Few-shot prompting improves several open-source models on reading comprehension but behaves inconsistently for proprietary models on translated tasks. We publicly release all datasets, evaluation code, and per-model results, and integrate the Kyrgyz tasks into a widely used multilingual evaluation framework to support future research on Kyrgyz NLP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2026.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  5. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  6. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  7. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  8. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 742
  9. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
  10. 2024Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluationcited by 191
  11. 2023Okapi: Instruction-tuned Large Language Models in Multiple Languages with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 190
  12. 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
4 more
  1. 2025The Bitter Lesson Learned from 2,000+ Multilingual Benchmarkscited by 31
  2. 2021Evaluating Multiway Multilingual NMT in the Turkic Languagescited by 8
  3. 2024Recent Advancements and Challenges of Turkic Central Asian Language Processingcited by 6
  4. 2024KyrgyzNLP: Challenges, Progress, and Futurecited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.