mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Method for Learning Value Systems in Generative AI

arXiv 2607.16903 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Value-aware AI systems require explicit computational representations of human values (groundings) and their aggregation into value systems in order to align their decisions with ours. As such representations are difficult to elicit, value learning seeks to infer them by observing human behaviour. This work addresses the lack of grounded value learning methods in generative AI: existing approaches typically replicate human preferences without awareness of the multidimensional structure of value alignment, or lack principled value system elicitation methods. To address these gaps, we adapt a previously validated value system learning method to the generative AI setting, which, based on pairwise prompt-response preference data, simultaneously learns: i) an implementation of a grounding for a set of values given by a multi-objective reward model, and ii) a value system representation in the form of a weighted linear scalarization of the previous grounding model. To ensure that the learned value systems are based on coherent value representations, our algorithm dynamically prioritizes the grounding learning process. We evaluate the method against baselines and a contemporary method on prompt-response preference datasets. Results show competitive performance and minimal trade-offs against the baselines, while improving explainability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 38 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
  3. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
  4. 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
  5. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 200
  6. 2023SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHFcited by 111
  7. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 107
  8. 2018On the Fenchel Duality between Strong Convexity and Lipschitz Continuous Gradientcited by 43
  9. 2024Align Anything: Training All-Modality Models to Follow Instructions with Language Feedbackcited by 39
  10. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modelingcited by 38
  11. 2020An Optimal Multistage Stochastic Gradient Method for Minimax Problemscited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning the Value Systems of Societies with Preference-based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Learning the Value Systems of Agents with Preference-based and Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024Democratizing Reward Design for Personal and Representative Value-Alignment
  4. 2025Generative Psycho-Lexical Approach for Constructing Value Systems in Large Language Models
  5. 2025Deep Value Benchmark: Measuring Whether Models Generalize Deep Values or Shallow Preferences
  6. 2026Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
  7. 2024Strong Preferences Affect the Robustness of Preference Models and Value Alignment
  8. 2025Learning a Canonical Basis of Human Preferences from Binary Ratings