mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Formerly Incarcerated People Envision Technologies for Prison Parole

arXiv 2607.16513 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-driven algorithms and automated tools are increasingly embedded in the correctional landscape, shaping parole eligibility,release decisions, and surveillance. These tools are also often framed as objective, inevitable solutions to inefficiency andbias. Yet, these computational systems are rarely designed with input from justice-impacted individuals, which means theymight fail to address the real needs of incarcerated people. To address this gap, we surveyed 31 formerly incarcerated peopleabout their parole experiences and their visions for technologies that could support parole preparation. Contrary to dominantassumptions, participants did not imagine computational tools as instruments to dismantle the prison system, but as resourcesfor navigating power: translating complex parole concepts into culturally familiar terms, documenting personal transformationin board-legible ways, and recognizing the often-invisible labor of families. We argue that these imaginaries point towardtechnologies designed for strategic agency, where tools help incarcerated individuals and their families build the capacity tonavigate existing power structures in pursuit of freedom. We conclude by reframing computational tools for parole awayfrom surveillance and toward human-centered systems that support people in navigating carceral power structures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 188 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 188 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  2. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  3. 2022Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learningcited by 47
  4. 2020Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differencescited by 41
  5. 2021Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd Workcited by 16
  6. 2022The Algorithmic Imprintcited by 10
  7. 2015Botivist: Calling Volunteers to Action Using Online Botscited by 7
  8. 2024Epistemic Power in AI Ethics Labor: Legitimizing Located Complaintscited by 6
  9. 2024Evidence of What, for Whom? The Socially Contested Role of Algorithmic Bias in a Predictive Policing Toolcited by 5
  10. 2022How Platform-User Power Relations Shape Algorithmic Accountability: A Case Study of Instant Loan Platforms and Financially Stressed Users in Indiacited by 4
  11. 2024The Fall of an Algorithm: Characterizing the Dynamics Toward Abandonmentcited by 4
  12. 2018Crowd Coach: Peer Coaching for Crowd Workers' Skill Growthcited by 3
9 more
  1. 2022Flipping the Script on Criminal Justice Risk Assessment: An actuarial model for assessing the risk the federal sentencing system poses to defendantscited by 3
  2. 2023The Progression of Disparities within the Criminal Justice System: Differential Enforcement and Risk Assessment Instrumentscited by 3
  3. 2024Structural Interventions and the Dynamics of Inequalitycited by 3
  4. 2026Co-Designing Collaborative Generative AI Tools for Freelancerscited by 3
  5. 2019TurkScanner: Predicting the Hourly Wage of Microtaskscited by 2
  6. 2020Becoming the Super Turker: Increasing Wages via a Strategy from High Earning Workerscited by 2
  7. 2023Organizational Governance of Emerging Technologies: AI Adoption in Healthcarecited by 2
  8. 2024Designing Sousveillance Tools for Gig Workerscited by 2
  9. 2019After You, Please: Browser Extensions Order Attacks and Countermeasurescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.