Frontier Language Models Struggle to Copy: Text Can Be Better Viewed in 2D
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models (LLMs) can solve advanced reasoning problems in seconds, we show that even frontier models fail to perform a much simpler operation: exactly copying an input string that lies well within their context windows. We attribute this failure to positional encodings in Transformer architectures, whose inductive bias favors copying through a shortcut based on matching local contexts rather than carefully locating the corresponding input positions. To address this issue, we introduce 2D-RoPE, which organizes text into a 2D grid rather than a 1D sequence and assigns each token a row ID and a column ID. Under this view, copying becomes simply retrieving input tokens at a fixed column offset, which makes the task easy to learn. In synthetic copy experiments, shallow Transformers with 2D-RoPE achieve perfect copying at input lengths hundreds of times longer than those seen during training, whereas standard positional encodings fall far behind. We further show that the advantage of 2D-RoPE language models on copy tasks consistently holds in large-scale pretraining on DCLM with model sizes up to 1.4B parameters. Overall, our results suggest that viewing text in 2D can benefit language modeling, and we hope this encourages future work to further explore the potential of 2D positional encodings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying
- 2024Exploring the Limitations of Mamba in COPY and CoT Reasoning
- 2026To Copy or Not to Copy: Controlling Speculative Decoding via Intrinsic Model Signals
- 2024Language Models "Grok" to Copy
- 2024PositionID: LLMs can Control Lengths, Copy and Paste with Explicit Positional Awareness
- 2026Copy-as-Decode: Grammar-Constrained Parallel Prefill for LLM Editing
- 2026Protoreasoning in Tiny Transformers
- 2026Distilling Sequential Computation in Transformer Language Models