mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dataset-Origin Signatures and Shortcut Learning in Screening Mammography AI: A Cross-Dataset Case Study

arXiv 2607.15416 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable AI for screening mammography requires training data representative of the low cancer prevalence and subtle abnormalities found in screening populations. We examined whether supplementing such data with biopsy-confirmed cases from abnormal-enriched external datasets improves performance. Using the Newfoundland and Labrador Breast Screening Dataset (NLBSD) alongside CBIS-DDSM and CMMD, we evaluated an EfficientNet-B5 encoder initialized with Mammo-CLIP weights as a frozen linear probe under consistent preprocessing and patient-level splits. The NLBSD-only model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.737 (95% CI [0.686, 0.785]). Adding external positive cases reduced performance in every configuration (AUC-ROC = 0.620--0.644; DeLong test, Holm-corrected p < 0.05), with degradation increasing as additional sources were introduced. Domain-matched evaluation produced modest gains only when the training and test domains coincided, and no configuration surpassed the NLBSD-only model. As a diagnostic, we reframed the task as predicting each examination's dataset of origin. The datasets were separated almost perfectly despite identical preprocessing, indicating that dataset-specific characteristics strongly influence the learned representation. These findings show that na"ively pooling abnormal-enriched mammography datasets can introduce domain shift that outweighs the benefit of additional positive cases. Differences in acquisition, intensity mapping, and dataset construction persist after normalization, motivating domain-aware strategies for combining heterogeneous mammography datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 39 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  2. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  3. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 352
  4. 2022VinDr-Mammo: A large-scale benchmark dataset for computer-aided diagnosis in full-field digital mammographycited by 84
  5. 2024A Decade's Battle on Dataset Bias: Are We There Yet?cited by 47
  6. 2020OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database: a large scale resource of mammography images and clinical datacited by 38
  7. 2024Mammo-CLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model to Enhance Data Efficiency and Robustness in Mammographycited by 38
  8. 2024Full Field Digital Mammography Dataset from a Population Screening Programcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MammoExpert: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Mammography Diagnosis
  2. 2026Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
  3. 2025A Versatile Foundation Model for AI-enabled Mammogram Interpretation
  4. 2025Mammo-CLIP Dissect: A Framework for Analysing Mammography Concepts in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Breast Cancer VLMs: Clinically Practical Vision-Language Train-Inference Models
  6. 2026MammoMix: Leveraging Mixture of Experts for Robust Mammogram Breast Detection
  7. 2025A Hybrid CNN-VSSM model for Multi-View, Multi-Task Mammography Analysis: Robust Diagnosis with Attention-Based Fusion
  8. 2025Comparison of ConvNeXt and Vision-Language Models for Breast Density Assessment in Screening Mammography