mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AnovaX: A Local, Multi-Agent Voice Assistant with LLM Planning, Typed Executors, and Adaptive Recovery

arXiv 2607.15367 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Desktop voice assistants are still dominated by cloud pipelines that ship raw audio off the machine and expose a fixed set of skills. We describe AnovaX, a small local-first assistant that runs entirely on the user's computer and treats the desktop itself as its action surface. A single Python process wires together a wake-word gate, a speech pipeline, an LLM planner (Gemini) that emits a JSON plan of tool calls, a whitelist-and-denylist safety layer, a multi-agent orchestrator that translates each plan into typed child agents on a bounded thread pool, and an adaptive recovery loop that takes over whenever a core step fails. Every tool corresponds to a specialized agent class (AppAgent, TypingAgent, BrowserAgent and six others) with its own timeout, retry policy, and shared-resource locks. A recursive MetaAgent lets the planner delegate a sub-goal back to itself, capped at two levels of nesting. The recovery loop uses a compact ReAct-style prompt and hides Gemini's latency behind speculative execution of read-only tools. A companion Flask server exposes a phone-friendly remote over the local WiFi, mirrors every agent lifecycle event to the phone in real time, and streams the laptop's screen back over MJPEG so the user can watch remote commands land as they run. The point of the project is less to compete with Siri or Alexa than to show that a legible, few-thousand-line assistant is enough to open apps, type into them, run searches, coordinate concurrent actions, recover from single-step failures, and be driven entirely from a phone in another room -- without the LLM ever touching the keyboard.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 10 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024EvoAgent: Towards Automatic Multi-Agent Generation via Evolutionary Algorithms20 Jun

Other references · 7

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  4. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,745
  5. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
  6. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
  7. 2023Android in the Wild: A Large-Scale Dataset for Android Device Controlcited by 319

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Talk2Agent: Benchmarking Voice Interfaces for Text Agents
  2. 2026Qwen-Audio-3.1-Realtime: Towards Reliable Agentic Voice Interaction
  3. 2026Evaluating Real-Time Voice Agents: From Component Quality to Grounded Outcomes
  4. 2025AURA: Agent for Understanding, Reasoning, and Automated Tool Use in Voice-Driven Tasks
  5. 2026DuplexAgent-RSI: Recursive Harness Improvement for Full-Duplex Voice Agent Collaboration
  6. 2026LLMs are General Asynchronous Agents
  7. 2026From Text to Voice: A Reproducible and Verifiable Framework for Evaluating Tool Calling LLM Agents
  8. 2026SpeechGym: An Audio-Native Gym for Training Voice Agents via Reinforcement Learning