Selectivity Drives Efficiency: Dataset Pruning for Visual Place Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent visual place recognition (VPR) studies have increasingly relied on large-scale datasets to train more robust and discriminative models. Although this trend significantly improves recognition performance, it also introduces substantial storage and training costs, especially when new architectures or training strategies need to be repeatedly developed and evaluated. Dataset pruning (DP) provides a promising way to improve data efficiency by retaining only informative training data. However, conventional DP methods mainly follow the sample-wise classification paradigm, which overlooks the relation-dependent training nature of VPR, where supervision is typically formed by image pairs rather than independent images. To address this issue, we propose a place-wise dataset pruning framework tailored for VPR. Instead of pruning individual images, our method treats each place as the basic pruning unit and introduces two complementary novel metrics, i.e., intra-place diversity (IPD) and inter-place similarity (IPS), to evaluate the training value of each place. By jointly considering these two metrics, our method ranks all places and constructs a compact yet informative coreset, thereby allowing the pruned dataset to still support the training of robust and discriminative VPR models. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art DP baselines under different pruning ratios while reducing selection and training costs. Moreover, by pruning a merged dataset roughly 3.5× the size of GSV-Cities to a comparable scale, our coreset maintains highly competitive performance, achieving 94.5% R@1 on MSLS-val and 97.0% R@1 on Nordland with only NetVLAD. Codes will be made publicly available.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.
Builds on
41 of 58 references.
References · 41
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 941
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 499
- 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
- 2021Patch-NetVLAD: Multi-Scale Fusion of Locally-Global Descriptors for Place Recognitioncited by 238
- 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 192
29 more
- 2022Rethinking Visual Geo-localization for Large-Scale Applicationscited by 163
- 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 161
- 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 156
- 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 152
- 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
- 2022Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Ratescited by 117
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Dataset Distillationcited by 115
- 2023EigenPlaces: Training Viewpoint Robust Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 111
- 2022TransVPR: Transformer-based place recognition with multi-level attention aggregationcited by 102
- 2023R2Former: Unified Retrieval and Reranking Transformer for Place Recognitioncited by 102
- 2022GSV-Cities: Toward Appropriate Supervised Visual Place Recognitioncited by 93
- 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
- 2022Deep Visual Geo-localization Benchmarkcited by 84
- 2024BoQ: A Place is Worth a Bag of Learnable Queriescited by 64
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2024CricaVPR: Cross-image Correlation-aware Representation Learning for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 61
- 2025MegaLoc: One Retrieval to Place Them Allcited by 60
- 2024Towards Seamless Adaptation of Pre-trained Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 49
- 2023Data-efficient Large Scale Place Recognition with Graded Similarity Supervisioncited by 43
- 2018Single-View Place Recognition under Seasonal Changescited by 35
- 2025A Coreset Selection of Coreset Selection Literature: Introduction and Recent Advancescited by 28
- 2024Close, But Not There: Boosting Geographic Distance Sensitivity in Visual Place Recognitioncited by 27
- 2025Focus on Local: Finding Reliable Discriminative Regions for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 16
- 2024EffoVPR: Effective Foundation Model Utilization for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 15
- 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 15
- 2025SelaVPR++: Towards Seamless Adaptation of Foundation Models for Efficient Place Recognitioncited by 14
- 2024EDTformer: An Efficient Decoder Transformer for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 10
- 2025UniPR-3D: Towards Universal Visual Place Recognition with Visual Geometry Grounded Transformercited by 8
- 2024Contributing Dimension Structure of Deep Feature for Coreset Selectioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.