mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Full-data accuracy with fewer labels for training and fine-tuning machine-learning force fields

arXiv 2607.14486 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) are reliable only near their training distribution, making efficient construction of diverse training sets a major bottleneck for both train-from-scratch and foundation fine-tuning workflows. Active learning can reduce this cost, but standard model-committee uncertainty is impractical for foundation MLFFs because each committee member requires a separate fine-tuning run. We present an active-learning workflow based on last-layer-projection regression (LLPR), a forward-pass-cheap per-configuration uncertainty estimator. Across molecular, condensed-phase, and electrolyte systems, LLPR identifies compact, high-value training sets that recover full-data accuracy using only a small fraction of electronic-structure labels. In foundation-model fine-tuning, LLPR-selected configurations reach the full-pool fine-tuning ceiling with substantially fewer labels than random selection. In iterative electrolyte fine-tuning, LLPR detects unphysical local coordination before DFT labelling, provides an absolute force-error threshold, and enables automatic termination of the learning loop. The resulting models reproduce reference density and ion-coordination structure, providing a scalable uncertainty-quantification strategy across MLFF training regimes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 40 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Machine Learning Force Fieldscited by 204
  2. 2022Forces are not Enough: Benchmark and Critical Evaluation for Machine Learning Force Fields with Molecular Simulationscited by 92
  3. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
  4. 2024Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Modelscited by 50
  5. 2018Active Learning of Uniformly Accurate Inter-atomic Potentials for Materials Simulationcited by 37
  6. 2023Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensemblescited by 30
  7. 2020Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learningcited by 14
  8. 2024Model-free quantification of completeness, uncertainties, and outliers in atomistic machine learning using information theorycited by 10
  9. 2024A prediction rigidity formalism for low-cost uncertainties in trained neural networkscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.