mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalized Distribution-Free Semi-Supervised Learning with Risk Rewrite

arXiv 2607.11947 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Typical semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods rely on distributional assumptions, and their performance degrades when these are violated. While PNU learning, a risk rewriting method, offers a distribution-free alternative, it is restricted to binary classification and its variance optimality remains unclear. In this paper, we propose a generalized framework that constructs unbiased risk estimators using linear combinations of component risks, subsuming PNU learning and extending to multiclass classification. We derive the minimum achievable variance, demonstrating our estimator can attain lower variance than PNU in asymmetric loss scenarios. Furthermore, we establish a generalization bound directly linking this variance reduction to improved learning performance. Based on these theoretical insights, we introduce two practical SSL methods that empirically match or outperform existing approaches on binary and multiclass benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.

Builds on

28 of 45 references.

References · 28

  1. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  2. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  3. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  4. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
  5. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  6. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 374
  7. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
  8. 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
  9. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  10. 2020An Overview of Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 121
  11. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  12. 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 86
16 more
  1. 2022Debiased Learning from Naturally Imbalanced Pseudo-Labelscited by 85
  2. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  3. 2019On Symmetric Losses for Learning from Corrupted Labelscited by 53
  4. 2016Theoretical Comparisons of Positive-Unlabeled Learning against Positive-Negative Learningcited by 41
  5. 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
  6. 2020Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data with Arbitrary Positive Shiftcited by 23
  7. 2019Classification from Pairwise Similarities/Dissimilarities and Unlabeled Data via Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 21
  8. 2017Semi-Supervised AUC Optimization based on Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 20
  9. 2023Kernel Density Estimation for Multiclass Quantificationcited by 8
  10. 2020Learning Classifiers under Delayed Feedback with a Time Window Assumptioncited by 7
  11. 2022Multi-class Classification from Multiple Unlabeled Datasets with Partial Risk Regularizationcited by 6
  12. 2023Anomaly detection with semi-supervised classification based on risk estimatorscited by 2
  13. 2025Multi-Agent VLMs Guided Self-Training with PNU Loss for Low-Resource Offensive Content Detectioncited by 2
  14. 2015Robust Semi-supervised Least Squares Classification by Implicit Constraintscited by 1
  15. 2018Binary Matrix Completion Using Unobserved Entriescited by 1
  16. 2019Semi-Supervised Ordinal Regression Based on Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.