Scaling Point-in-Time Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models trained on unrestricted internet corpora inevitably embed information from the future, introducing lookahead bias that compromises the validity of backtests and causal inference in finance and the social sciences. Point-in-time language models--trained exclusively on text available up to each calendar date--eliminate this leakage by construction, but existing efforts typically produce models that lag substantially behind their unconstrained counterparts. We show that this performance gap can be substantially narrowed through scale. Training decoder-only transformers with up to 4 billion parameters on 1 trillion chronologically filtered tokens from FineWeb, we construct a sequence of monthly model checkpoints spanning 2013-2024. Across a range of common-sense reasoning and language understanding benchmarks, our models approach the performance of leading open-weight models of comparable size (e.g., Gemma-3-4B and LLaMA-7B) trained on temporally unrestricted data, although a performance gap remains on several tasks. Instruction fine-tuning via LoRA further improves downstream usability. We release the complete pipeline--including dataset construction, training infrastructure, and evaluation code--to enable reproducible point-in-time language modeling and to support research applications that require strict temporal validity.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
57 of 91 references.
References · 57
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
38 more
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 621
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
- 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
- 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
- 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 313
- 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 250
- 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 247
- 2023Continual Pre-training of Language Modelscited by 194
- 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 173
- 2024Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durationscited by 160
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 138
- 2023Continual Pre-Training of Large Language Models: How to (re)warm your model?cited by 135
- 2023Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Modelscited by 125
- 2023LaMini-LM: A Diverse Herd of Distilled Models from Large-Scale Instructionscited by 124
- 2023LLMs as Narcissistic Evaluators: When Ego Inflates Evaluation Scorescited by 88
- 2023Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 70
- 2024Reuse, Don't Retrain: A Recipe for Continued Pretraining of Language Modelscited by 69
- 2024LoRA Land: 310 Fine-tuned LLMs that Rival GPT-4, A Technical Reportcited by 47
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.