mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Explainable Agentic System for Detection of Conversational Scams with Summary-Based Memory

arXiv 2607.11707 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.MA cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Following the rapid progress of generative Artificial Intelligence, there is a growing threat posed by conversational scams. These scams often span over multiple weeks or months, gradually build trust and request for money or sensitive information. Existing scam-detection systems mainly focus on isolated messages, which renders them inadequate against this evolving threat. This paper extends single-message phishing detection and presents an explainable agentic system for detecting sophisticated conversational scams. It also introduces ConScamBench-278, an initial public multi-category benchmark for conversational scam detection spanning eight scam types, released to support reproducible evaluation and future expansion. On isolated messages the single-message detector attains 100% phishing recall, while the conversation-level detector identifies all conversational scams in the public LoveFraud02 corpus (83/83) and reaches 97.8% accuracy (95% CI [95.4, 99.0]) on ConScamBench-278. Two user studies (N = 100 and N = 45) further motivate the system: participants report frequently experiencing uncertainty when judging suspicious conversations. In an uncontrolled pre/post comparison, users self-reported trust, self-confidence, and perceived need for AI-based scam detection all increased (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank). The system also receives a System Usability Scale score of 74.7 (95% CI [72.5, 76.9]), above the established usability benchmark.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  2. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 800
  3. 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 760
  4. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
  5. 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
  6. 2017Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialoguescited by 202
  7. 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 195
  8. 2025SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigationcited by 18
  9. 2024An Explorative Study of Pig Butchering Scamscited by 4
  10. 2025Love, Lies, and Language Models: Investigating AI's Role in Romance-Baiting Scamscited by 3
  11. 2026The Anatomy of Conversational Scams: A Topic-Based Red Teaming Analysis of Multi-Turn Interactions in LLMscited by 2
  12. 2026Regulatory gray areas of LLM Termscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ScamPilot: Simulating Conversations with LLMs to Protect Against Online Scams ↗
  2. 2026Making Sense of Scams: Understanding Scam Conversations Through Multi-Level Alignment ↗
  3. 2025Anticipate, Simulate, Reason (ASR): A Comprehensive Generative AI Framework for Combating Messaging Scams
  4. 2025ScamAgents: How AI Agents Can Simulate Human-Level Scam Calls
  5. 2026Black-Box Forensics for Conversational LLM Agents
  6. 2025CASE: An Agentic AI Framework for Enhancing Scam Intelligence in Digital Payments
  7. 2026Incremental Risk Assessment of Progressive Elder Financial Scams via Instruction-Tuned Small Language Models
  8. 2025Debate-Driven Multi-Agent LLMs for Phishing Email Detection