mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Love, Lies, and Language Models: Investigating AI's Role in Romance-Baiting Scams

arXiv 2512.16280 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Romance-baiting scams have become a major source of financial and emotional harm worldwide. These operations are run by organized crime syndicates that traffic thousands of people into forced labor, requiring them to build emotional intimacy with victims over weeks of text conversations before pressuring them into fraudulent cryptocurrency investments. Because the scams are inherently text-based, they raise urgent questions about the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in both current and future automation. We investigate this intersection by interviewing 145 insiders and 5 scam victims, performing a blinded long-term conversation study comparing LLM scam agents to human operators, and executing an evaluation of commercial safety filters. Our findings show that LLMs are already widely deployed within scam organizations, with 87% of scam labor consisting of systematized conversational tasks readily susceptible to automation. In a week-long study, an LLM agent not only elicited greater trust from study participants (p=0.007) but also achieved higher compliance with requests than human operators (46% vs. 18% for humans). Meanwhile, popular safety filters detected 0.0% of romance baiting dialogues. Together, these results suggest that romance-baiting scams may be amenable to full-scale LLM automation, while existing defenses remain inadequate to prevent their expansion.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 58 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  4. 2023SoulChat: Improving LLMs' Empathy, Listening, and Comfort Abilities through Fine-tuning with Multi-turn Empathy Conversationscited by 110
  5. 2024Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilitiescited by 95
  6. 2024People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing testcited by 48
  7. 2025Large Language Models Pass the Turing Testcited by 48
  8. 2023Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test?cited by 37
  9. 2023Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Questioncited by 26
  10. 2024Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health Supportcited by 21
  11. 2025Human Decision-making is Susceptible to AI-driven Manipulationcited by 19
  12. 2023Challenges of Large Language Models for Mental Health Counselingcited by 17
3 more
  1. 2024Are You Human? An Adversarial Benchmark to Expose LLMscited by 5
  2. 2024An Explorative Study of Pig Butchering Scamscited by 5
  3. 2024A Survey of Scam Exposure, Victimization, Types, Vectors, and Reporting in 12 Countriescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EUDAIMONIA: Evaluating Undesirable Dynamics in AI
  2. 2025Why Do Language Model Agents Whistleblow?
  3. 2026ScamPilot: Simulating Conversations with LLMs to Protect Against Online Scams ↗
  4. 2024When LLMs Go Online: The Emerging Threat of Web-Enabled LLMs
  5. 2024Fortifying Ethical Boundaries in AI: Advanced Strategies for Enhancing Security in Large Language Models
  6. 2024Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents
  7. 2024Whispers in the Machine: Confidentiality in Agentic Systems
  8. 2025A closer look at how large language models trust humans: patterns and biases